In the race to the top of the Vaccine manufacturing foodchain product side effects such as infertility are being overlooked in favor of scientific advancement. One competitor, U.S. firm Celldex Theraputics are vying for major positioning in the ranks with a radical new generation cancer vaccine now in development for the treatment of advanced colorectal, pancreatic, bladder, ovarian, cervical and breast cancers. Purported to eradicate cancer cells, it is “designed to deliver the antigen hCG-β to dendritic cells (DCs) and induce hCG-β specific cellular and humoral immune responses, thus activating the immune system against cancers that express hCG-β”.

This process of introducing hCG into the bloodstream effectively neutralizes a woman’s reproductive capacity. The Tetanus shots  in the ‘90’s were contaminated with immune-suppressant contraceptive in the form of hCG, a hormone crucial to female fertility balance. By inserting hCG next to a deadly live virus into the body the immune system instinctively reacts to both intruders as hostile. The end result saw hundreds of thousands of healthy women inadvertently sterilized by these shots.

‘During the early 1990s, the World Health Organization had been overseeing massive vaccination campaigns against tetanus in a number of countries, among them Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines. In October 1994, HLI received a communication from its Mexican affiliate, the Comite’ Pro Vida de Mexico, regarding that country’s anti-tetanus campaign. Suspicious of the campaign protocols, the Comite’ obtained several vials of the vaccine and had them analyzed by chemists.

Some of the vials were found to contain human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), a naturally occurring hormone essential for maintaining a pregnancy. Only women were vaccinated, and only the women between the ages of 15 and 45. (In Nicaragua the age range was 12-49).’
http://www.thinktwice.com/birthcon.htm

‘Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) is a hormone produced in pregnancy that is made by the developing embryo after conception and later by the placenta. Its role is to prevent the disintegration of the hormonal structure of the ovaries and thereby maintains progesterone production that is critical for pregnancy in women. hCG also affects the immune tolerance of the pregnancy.

Ironically, the hCG hormone the researchers are trying to destroy is actually used during female infertility treatments in order to stimulate the release of eggs from the ovaries. Temporary depression and disruption of hCG causes a range of hormonal imbalances and is considered a leading cause of miscarriages. Consequently, many once infertile women may suddenly conceive with repeated injections of hCG.

One of the primary reasons that women who abuse cocaine can no longer conceive is because of hCG disruption. Cocaine inhibits hCG concentrations in maternal circulation which affects secretion by the placenta required to maintain pregnancy.

The biological processes of how hCG disrupts pregnancy also differ between different species so translating biological mechanisms from animal testing to humans is redundant. Regardless, drug studies continue to use these results if the conclusions/outcome are favourable to their objectives.’
http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/vaccination/articles/toxic-cancer-vaccine-being-developed-will-destroy-human-fertility.html

CELLDEX: ‘Our lead APC Targeting Technology™ product candidate, CDX-1307, is in development for the treatment of cancers that express the beta chain of human chorionic gonadotropin ( hCG-β). hCG-β is an established tumor-associated antigen that is over-expressed in a variety of common cancers including those of the colon, lung, pancreas, esophagus, breast, bladder, cervix, stomach, and prostate, but not expressed in most normal tissues. Elevated hCG-β serum levels and/or tissue expression have been shown to be an independent predictor of poor disease outcome and associated with a more aggressive disease course. Mechanistically, it has been proposed that hCG-β may function at several different levels to facilitate cancer progression: as a transforming growth factor, an immunosuppressive agent, an inducer of metastasis, and/or as an angiogenic factor. CDX-1307 is composed of a human monoclonal antibody targeting the mannose receptor found on dendritic cells, fused to the hCG-β antigen. This antibody-vaccine is designed to deliver hCG-β to dendritic cells and induce cellular & humoral immune responses against hCG-β, thus activating the patient’s immune system against cancers that express hCG-β. CDX-1307 has been evaluated for the treatment of advanced colorectal, pancreatic, bladder, ovarian and breast cancers in 2 Phase 1 trials. Phase 2 trial of CDX-1307 in treatment of newly diagnosed bladder cancer underway.’
http://www.celldextherapeutics.com/wt/page/trials_cdx1307_breast

ORIGINS OF CDX-1307: ‘A team of researchers from Middlesex University have developed a vaccine approach which could be the first of a whole new generation of cancer drugs with the potential to target specific cancers at source. This technique could lead to far quicker treatment of aggressive cancers, with patients experiencing fewer of the side-effects which chemotherapy often causes.

World expert in biomedical science, Professor Ray Iles, and colleagues at Middlesex University’s Centre for Investigative and Diagnostic Oncology, are currently working with US pharmaceutical company, Celldex Therapeutics, to test the vaccine in clinical trials involving patients who have recently been diagnosed with bladder cancer. Initial results suggest that the lives and prognoses for thousands of cancer sufferers may improve radically and it is thought that the technique could ultimately delay the onset of certain types of cancer.

Bladder cancer affects four times as many men as women, with 10,000 new cases being diagnosed in the UK each year. It is the fourth most common cancer in men and is the sixth most common cause of cancer death amongst men in the UK. At present, 75% of cases are lethal. The vaccine will be trialled over a five year period, amongst a group of 60 newly-diagnosed patients with the cancer.

For Professor Iles, this is a real highpoint in a twenty-year research career in biomedical science. In 1987 he discovered that certain cancers, including bladder cancer, produce a fragment of the pregnancy hormone hCGβ – known in the science world as ‘HCG’ – which encourages aggressive activity by cancerous cells. Since then, a series of studies have been conducted by Professor Iles and Dr Stephen Butler, another member of the Middlesex team, culminating in the development of the vaccine by Celldex. The vaccine targets and neutralises the cells producing this hormone, before these cells have the chance to attack other, healthy cells.

Professor Iles said: “The vaccine has the potential to help us make rapid advances in the treatment of this invasive cancer. It appears to block cancer-activating hormones, which in turn reduces the growth of tumours in distant organs – secondary cancers known as metastases. The same molecule occurs in both cervical and pancreatic cancers, and so in time, this type of vaccine could offer treatment benefits across a range of other highly invasive cancers too”.’
http://www.mdx.ac.uk/aboutus/news-events/news/bladdercancerresearch.aspx

CLINICAL TRIALS UNDERWAY: A Study of the CDX-1307 Vaccine Regimen in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (The “N-ABLE” Study)
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01094496?term=CDX-1307&rank=3

UPDATE: The Rockefeller Foundation funded HCG Hormone Vaccine research
“…several types of drugs are known to diminish male fertility, but those that have been tested have serious problems of toxicity. Very little work is in progress on immunological methods, such as vaccines, to reduce fertility, and much more research is required if a solution is to be found here.”
http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/uploads/files/1496d619-017d-4b13-8a64-fce8ed4f785d-1968.pdf
http://www.infowars.com/rockefeller-foundation-developed-vaccines-for-%E2%80%9Cmass-scale%E2%80%9D-fertility-reduction/

“The work on LHRH and HCG vaccines was supported by research grants of The Rockefeller Foundation.”
http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/3/4/301.pdf

The United States flu vaccine for 2010-2011/AFLURIA® will be manufactured by CSL Laboratories in partnership with Merck Pharmaceuticals. Ingredients: 24.5 mcg of thimerosal mercury (safe level for a 2450 pound adult), Neomycin & Polymyxin (antibiotics associated with Kidney Failure, hazardous to fetus), 3 strains of flu virus including A/Brisbane/59/2007 (H1N1 subunits).
http://preventdisease.com/news/pdf/CSL_2009_LatestAfluriaPackageInsert_ucm112730.pdf

CSL/MERCK PARTNERSHIP – Merck & Co., Inc. has entered into an exclusive agreement with CSL Biotherapies, a subsidiary of CSL Limited, to market and distribute AFLURIA® (Influenza Virus Vaccine), CSL’s seasonal influenza (flu) vaccine, in the U.S., for the 2010/2011-2015/2016 flu seasons. With the addition of seasonal flu vaccine, Merck will market eight of the 10 vaccines on the recommended immunization schedule for adults in the U.S.
http://www.merck.com/newsroom/news-release-archive/corporate/2009_0928.html

‘Two flu vaccine makers said on Friday they had started shipping supplies for the U.S. market, one of the earliest starts ever to distributing seasonal influenza vaccine. And U.S. officials said they were changing the labeling on a vaccine made by Australia’s CSL Ltd because it appears to have caused a higher than usual rate of seizures in children.

“The labeling for one vaccine, CSL Limited’s Afluria, has undergone changes this season to inform health care providers about an increased incidence of fever and febrile seizure, which was seen in young children, mainly those younger than 5 years, following administration of the 2010 Southern Hemisphere formulation of CSL’s influenza vaccine,” the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said in a statement.

“CSL Limited will not be supplying the United States with the 0.25 milliliter single-dose, prefilled syringes, which are used in very young children.” The FDA said it was asking CSL to conduct a study of its vaccine in children.

Flu vaccines have to be made fresh every year to match the circulating strains of the virus. They are made using old technology involving chicken eggs, and manufacturers cannot always predict how much vaccine they will be able to produce and when. A few companies can now make vaccine in cells and governments are working with industry to switch over to faster and more predictable ways to make flu vaccines.’
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE66T55L20100730

AFLURIA®, Influenza Virus Vaccine for intramuscular injection, is a sterile, clear, colorless to slightly opalescent suspension with some sediment that resuspends upon shaking to form a homogeneous suspension. AFLURIA® is prepared from influenza virus propagated in the allantoic fluid of embryonated chicken eggs. Following harvest, the virus is purified in a sucrose density gradient using a continuous flow zonal centrifuge.

The purified virus is inactivated with beta-propiolactone, and the virus particles are disrupted using sodium taurodeoxycholate to produce a “split virion”. The disrupted virus is further purified and suspended in a phosphate buffered isotonic solution. AFLURIA® is standardized according to USPHS requirements for the 2008-2009 influenza season and is formulated to contain 45 mcg HA per 0.5 mL dose in the recommended ratio of 15 mcg HA for each of the three influenza strains recommended for the 2008-2009 Northern Hemisphere influenza season: A/H1N1 (A/Brisbane/59/2007), A/H3N2 (A/Uruguay/716/2007), and influenza B (B/Florida/4/2006).

A single 0.5 mL dose of AFLURIA® contains sodium chloride (4.1 mg), monobasic sodium phosphate (80 mcg), dibasic sodium phosphate (300 mcg), monobasic potassium phosphate (20 mcg), potassium chloride (20 mcg), and calcium chloride (1.5 mcg). From the manufacturing process, each dose may also contain residual amounts of sodium taurodeoxycholate (≤ 10 ppm), ovalbumin (≤ 1 mcg), neomycin sulfate (≤ 0.2 picograms [pg]), polymyxin B (≤ 0.03 pg), and beta-propiolactone (< 25 nanograms).

• 5 mL multi-dose vial containing ten doses. Thimerosal, a mercury derivative, is added as a preservative; each 0.5 mL dose contains 24.5 mcg of mercury.

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS:

1. Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) – If GBS has occurred within 6 weeks of previous influenza vaccination, the decision to give AFLURIA® should be based on careful consideration of the potential benefits and risks. Neurological disorders temporally associated with influenza vaccination, such as encephalopathy, optic neuritis/neuropathy, partial facial paralysis, and brachial plexus neuropathy, have been reported. Microscopic polyangiitis (vasculitis) has been reported temporally associated with influenza vaccination.

2. AFLURIA® is contraindicated in individuals with known hypersensitivity to eggs or chicken protein, neomycin, or polymyxin, or in anyone who has had a life-threatening reaction to previous influenza vaccination.

3. Serious allergic reactions, including anaphylactic shock, have been observed during postmarketing surveillance in individuals receiving AFLURIA®. Although AFLURIA® contains only a limited quantity of egg protein, this protein can induce immediate hypersensitivity reactions among persons who have severe egg allergy. Allergic reactions include hives, angioedema, allergic asthma, and systemic anaphylaxis.

4. Pregnancy: Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with AFLURIA®. It is also not known whether AFLURIA® can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity. AFLURIA® should be given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed.

5. Nursing Mothers: AFLURIA® has not been evaluated in nursing mothers. It is not known whether AFLURIA® is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, caution should be exercised when AFLURIA® is administered to a nursing woman.

6. Pediatric Use: Safety and effectiveness in the pediatric population have not been established.

7. Geriatric Use: In four clinical studies, 343 subjects ages 65 years and older received AFLURIA®. Hemagglutination-inhibiting (HI) antibody responses in geriatric subjects were lower after administration of AFLURIA® in comparison to younger adult subjects (see Clinical Studies [14]). Adverse event rates were generally similar in frequency to those reported in subjects ages 18 to less than 65 years, although some differences were observed.

VRM: Australian Vaccine Scandal: Most multi-dose vaccines currently average 2.5 micrograms of Thimerosal Mercury. Based on EPA standards this is considered a safe level of exposure for a 250 pound adult. Australia’s 2010 Flu vaccine Panvax contains 50 micrograms of Thimerosal; technically a safe level of exposure for a 5000 pound adult. Unless you were born a Mack Truck this is tantamount to attempted murder. Time for the Australian community to rise up against this tyranny with a massive Class Action law suit.

THE REAL REASON SO MANY YOUNG CHILDREN ARE BEING ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY AUSTRALIA’S 2010 FLU SHOT COCKTAIL (WHICH NOW INCLUDES THE PANVAX VACCINE)?

CONTENTS: A STAGGERING 50 MICROGRAMS OF MERCURY IN THE SHOT (MOST CURRENT MULTI-DOSE VACCINES AVG 2.5), H1N1 SUBUNITS (LIVE VIRUS SLIGHTLY MODIFIED WITH DETERGENT), NEOMYCIN (HAZARDOUS TO ALL PREGNANT WOMEN) & POLYMYXIN (2 ANTIBIOTICS ASSOCIATED WITH KIDNEY FAILURE), BETA-PROPLOLACTONE (CARCINOGEN).

‘Included in the ingredients are two antibiotics, Neomycin and Polymyxin B Sulphate. Both are noted for serious side effects, predominantly kidney failure. It is warned both these antibiotics not be used by pregnant women. Neomycin is in the FDA pregnancy category D. This means that it is known to be harmful to an unborn baby. In the “first tier” of candidates to receive this unregistered, unapproved vaccine, pregnant women are on top of the list. Beta-Propiolactone is another listed ingredient. Ranked as one of the most hazardous compounds (worst 10%) to humans and “reasonably expected to be a human carcinogen” (International Agency for Research on Cancer – IARC, 1999). Βeta-Propiolactone is a disinfectant. Panvax is formulated using chick embryos (Ovalbumin). People who suffer allergy to eggs or anaphylactic reactions may experience problems.’
http://contribute.abc.net.au/_Panvax/blog/718273/32422.html

‘The Australian is reporting that clinical tests were never carried out on this particular vaccine, which was a first-time combination of seasonal flu with Panvax, a vaccine against the H1N1 strain. Australia was the first country to use this type of vaccine, the report said. Panvax was tested on 400 children before its release last year, but the combined shot was not subjected to any clinical trials.’
http://www.newsinferno.com/archives/19877

Related Report: Flu vaccine push already underway; first batch causes seizures in children
http://www.naturalnews.com/029334_flu_vaccines_seizures.html

Quinvaxem, a powerful 5 in 1 vaccine currently being distributed in India, containing live Diphtheria, Tetanus, Hib oligosaccharide (Haemophilus influenzae) & Hepatitis B viruses plus an inactivated B. Pertussis virus (heat treated or attenuated), has already caused the deaths of at least 5 children in Sri Lanka according to the WHO, 8 children in Bhutan and at least 3 children in Pakistan. Further serious adverse side effects have also been reported. More than 34 million doses of the vaccine had been distributed worldwide as at March 2008.

Sri Lankan authorities initially withdrew the vaccine in 2008 ‘after 25 serious adverse reactions that included five deaths and Bhutan stopped its use within two months of introduction in July 2009 after eight deaths.’ But in a bizarre twist Sri Lanka has recently reintroduced Quinvaxem, without any changes to the product itself, after a WHO expert panel, which investigated the events, declared that the vaccine was ‘unlikely’ to have caused the deaths.
http://sify.com/news/vaccine-may-be-killing-children-uk-report-news-national-kh4k94efdid.html

According to the British Medical Journal the World Health Organisation (WHO), in an elaborate cover-up, changed its own criteria for classifying adverse effects to say the vaccine was not responsible for the deaths in Sri Lanka,’ Jacob Puliyel, head of paediatrics at St Stephen’s Hospital in Delhi and key author, told IANS.

‘20 reports of non-fatal AEFIs described as suggestive of hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode (referred to as HHE-like) following use of the pentavalent vaccine had been submitted to the Epidemiological Unit of the Ministry of Health. HHE is a recognized adverse reaction to whole-cell and acellular pertussis-containing vaccines, and to Haemophilus influenzae type b and hepatitis B vaccines. It is self-limited with no long-term sequelae.’
http://www.who.int/immunization_safety/aefi/investigation_pentavalent_Sri_Lanka/en/index1.html

Since 2006 a total of $910 Million including a $110 million grant from Unicef “to Support Vaccination Programs In The Developing World” has been awarded to Dutch biopharma company Crucell, a global biopharmaceutical company austensibly “focused on research development, production and marketing of vaccines, proteins and antibodies that prevent and/or treat infectious diseases” for their new fully liquid pentavalent vaccine QuinvaxemTM (*co-developed with Novartis Vaccines, Diagnostics of Chiron & Berna Biotech in Korea). The much touted vaccine “for protection against five childhood diseases” was prequalified by the World Health Organization in September 2006, enabling Crucell to bypass normal safety requisite procedures.
http://www.bioresearchonline.com/article.mvc/Crucell-Announces-New-Award-Of-110M-For-0001?atc~c=771+s=773+r=001+l=a&VNETCOOKIE=NO

“WHO prequalification for Quinvaxem (TM) marks an important milestone for Crucell as we pursue our strategy of becoming a leading vaccine player,” said Crucell’s CEO, Dr Ronald H.P. Brus. “The public-private partnership between the United Nations Organizations, Crucell and Novartis over the many years of its development have made this innovative vaccine a reality. We believe this vaccine will make an important contribution to pediatric vaccination programs for the developing world, and will confirm Crucell’s place as a leading supplier of such important vaccines.”
http://www.lifescience-online.com/Crucell_Announces_WHO_Prequalification_for_Quinvax,1874.html?portalPage=Lifescience+Today.News

Crucell internal data reveals a staggering formulation behind Quinvaxem: including 4 live viruses (*some contents produced in genetically engineered yeast cells) , 1 attenuated live virus, Aluminium phosphate, thimerosal & formaldehyde.

Quinvaxem™composition per 1 dose (0.5 ml):
• Diphtheria toxoid ³ 30 IU
• Tetanus toxoid ³ 60 IU
• inactivated B. pertussis ³ 4 IU
• Hib oligosaccharide 10 μg, conjugated to ~25 μg of CRM197
• Hepatitis B surface antigen 10 μg • Aluminium phosphate 1.36 mg

* Contains traces of thimerosal as a residue from manufacturing process. Antigen production:
• Diphtheria toxoid, Tetanus toxoid
Prepared from C. diphteriae and C. tetani cultures by
inactivation of the toxins with formaldehyde and purification
• Inactivated B. pertussis
Prepared from inactivated and purified B. pertussis cultures
• CRM-Hib
Purified H. influenzae capsular oligosaccharides are
conjugated to CRM197, a detoxified mutant of diphtheria toxin

Antigen production:
• Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)
Produced in genetically engineered yeast cells (Hansenula
polymorpha) carrying the relevant gene of the HBsAg
Process steps:
– growth of cells
– disruption of cells
– inactivation
– purification of HBsAg

Sources of antigens:
• Diphtheria toxoid, Tetanus toxoid, Pertussis suspension:
Novartis Behring, Marburg, Germany
• CRM-Hib:
Novartis Siena, Siena, Italy
• HBsAg:
Berna Biotech Korea Corp. (BBKC), Yongin, Korea
All antigens are shipped to Berna Biotech Korea Corp. for
formulation, filling and packaging of the product

QuinvaxemTM: quality (as of May 29, 2006):
• BBKC serves as a model for Korean authority (KFDA) in
terms of quality systems and cGMP
• production in BBKC is fulfilling international standards
• recently inspected by WHO, with overall favourable
conclusion

• The collaboration between Crucell/Berna Biotech and Novartis Vaccines resulted in the successful development of the new fully liquid pentavalent vaccine QuinvaxemTM
http://www.salsoc.org.ar/Berna/presentaciones/5_Quinvaxem_Spyr.pdf

‘”For 2008 we see sales of Quinvaxem significantly higher than in 2007,” Crucell’s Chief executive officer Ronald Brus told analysts but did not give a specific figure. In 2007 Crucell sold 21.3 million units Quinvaxem, up from 6.3 million in 2006.’
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSWEB483020080212

Dr. Russell Blaylock, one of the world’s foremost brain surgeons has pointed out that multiple live viruses, when combined in a single dose vaccine, frequently result in auto-immune failure & severe neurological distress, Ischemia and in some circumstances even death.

“Some vaccines, including the MMR, smallpox, and chickenpox vaccines, contain live viruses. By giving three and sometimes four live viruses together, the risk of developing a lifetime viral infection (a persistent viral infection) increases tremendously. This is especially so with the MMR vaccine, which contains two live viruses known to suppress the immune system for months.”
Dr.Russell L. Blaylock M.D.

“Heavy metals & viruses in vaccines cause abnormal development in brain, long-term changes that put a child at high risk of neuro-degenerative diseases ie. Parkinson’s & Alzheimer’s for the rest of their life; also they become hyper-sensitive to environmental toxins (Pesticides, Herbicides). Live viruses in vaccines are incorporated into your genetic material &  passed on to your children. Many rare forms of cancer are now very common ie Pancreatic cancer. Lymphoma is now the number one malignancy in 30 year olds and rising. Asthma has seen a ten fold increase over last 2 decades. Type 1 Diabetes has also been linked to auto-immune disorder caused by vaccines.” Dr. Russell Blaylock

Eugenics: the study of methods of improving the quality of the human race, esp by selective breeding [from Greek eugenēs well-born, from eu- + -genēs born; see -gen]. The science of improving a breed or species through the careful selection of parents.  — eugenicist, n.  — eugenic, adj.

Just who is pulling the strings? Many political analysts believe the Rockefeller Foundation wields more power behind the scenes than most formally elected governments. One aspect in particular raises many concerns – their influence over the course of the Pharmaceutical Industry; having monopolized every major Drug Company Board of Directors & powerful lobby group vying for drug/vaccine research & development. In addition historically the Rockefeller family financed the Eugenics movement long before the rise of Hitler’s Third Reich with substantial donations to the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Germany.

In America they were on the vanguard of advanced medical & scientific research. During 1942 the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, centered in Princeton, New Jersey, undertook a major study titled ‘Synergistic Action Of Hemophilus Influenzae Suis And The Swine influenza Virus On The Chick Embryo’ led by Frederik B. Bang, M.D. through the Department of Animal and Plant Pathology.

The darker implications of their discovery, the harnessing of animal-human live viruses & bacterium for bio-weaponry purposes (H1N1 Swine flu + H1N2 Swine flu + H5N1 Bird flu + H3N2 Human flu + Bacteria = Pandemic) cannot be ignored given the Rockefeller history of involvement in the eugenics movement; suggesting more than just a benign generosity of enlightened philanthropists at work.

“We have found that the combined infection of embryos with swine influenza virus and H. infl~nzae suis produces a highly lethal infection, while neither one alone kills many embryos. Infection with the virus allows the Hemophilus to persist longer than it does in normal embryos. Finally the combined infection has a selective destructive effect on the embryo lungs.” Frederik B. Bang, M.D/1942

The Rockefeller Foundation recently published “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development’; an in depth examination of society under various degrees/types of dictatorial ‘governance’ -  the implications that, given a total societal collapse, humans would willingly relinquish their already limited freedoms in exchange for manageable order; a grave reminder of how the so called ‘useless eaters’ or ‘bottom feeders’ are perceived by the elites, as essentially passive & malleable, subject to conditioning on a flowchart. The Rockefeller vision, a dystopic clinical analysis of human behavior in response to a major pandemic leaves little doubt as to the ultimate purpose behind the veil of misguided over-reaching philanthropy.

Excerpt from study: Scenario Narratives: LOCK STEP – A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback:

In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults.

However, a few countries did fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter postpandemic recovery.

China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.

At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.

Technology trends and applications we might see:

• Scanners using advanced functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technology become the norm at airports and other public areas to detect abnormal behavior that may indicate “antisocial intent.”

• In the aftermath of pandemic scares, smarter packaging for food and beverages is applied first by big companies and producers in a business-to-business environment, and then adopted for individual products and consumers.

• New diagnostics are developed to detect communicable diseases. The application of health screening also changes; screening becomes a prerequisite for release from a hospital or prison, successfully slowing the spread of many diseases.

• Tele-presence technologies respond to the demand for less expensive, lowerbandwidth, sophisticated communications systems for populations whose travel is restricted.

• Driven by protectionism and national security concerns, nations create their own independent, regionally defined IT networks, mimicking China’s firewalls. Governments have varying degrees of success in policing internet traffic, but these efforts nevertheless fracture the “World Wide” Web.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National autodetermination practiced in past centuries.” David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991

“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure–one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” David Rockefeller’s ‘Memoirs’

“Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.” David Rockefeller

“The world has a cancer, and that cancer is man.” Merton Lambert, former spokesman for the Rockefeller Foundation

Britain’s National Health Service is rapidly destroying the UK Health Care system; dismantling local programs, stripping hospitals of essential service staff, downsizing hospitals altogether, refusing to upgrade old equipment – all under the guise of tightening the belt, preserving what’s left of diminishing resources.

Meanwhile top executives of the NHS have recently received enormous salary bonuses & increases which stagger even conventional economic forecasting rationale. They are nothing short of a criminal syndicate run wild, bent on fleecing the public while ensuring the standards for health care plummet to never before seen depths. Is it not time for a full scale inquiry? Have we not been fooled enough?

‘Thousands of NHS jobs in England are being cut despite government promises to protect frontline services, a union says. The Royal College of Nursing has identified nearly 10,000 posts – double the number from two months ago. The RCN said this was just the start of what was shaping up to be a “crude” round of cuts which would harm patient care. But managers said some job losses were necessary. While the NHS budget is being protected, the health service has been told to save up to £20bn by 2014 to help it cope with increasing pressures from the ageing population, rising price of drugs and lifestyle changes such as obesity.

Ministers have talked about making the system more efficient by encouraging care to be moved away from hospitals and into the community. But RCN chief executive Peter Carter said the latest findings suggested that the health system was simply falling back on “crude” and “short-sighted” cuts. “Our figures expose the myth that frontline services will be protected. If this trend for cuts continues the NHS will soon be straining at the seams.”‘
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/10530621.stm

National Health Service Executives earn huge salaries despite the necessity for drastic budget cuts -

David Nicholson, the British National Health Service Chief Executive earns between £255,000 & £259,999 (approximately $520,000) annually. Gabriel Scally, NHS regional director of public health earns between £200,000 – £204,999. In total 11 DOP executives earn from £150,000 to £200,000. This despite a 21% cut in health services & the sudden firing of 100 hospital workers.
http://www.healthcarerepublic.com/news/bulletin/DAILY_NEWS/article/1006830/?DCMP=EMC-BreakingnewsfromHealthcareRepublic

NHS Executives within the high-end bracket include:

David Nicholson, NHS Chief Executive Permanent Secretary Dept. of Health (£255,000 – £259,999)   Includes a gross benefit in kind of £45-50k for a rented flat and associated expenses in London
Clare Chapman, Director General of Workforce & Dept. of Health (£220,000 – £224,999)
Sir Liam Donaldson, former chief medical officer/Secretary Dept. of Health (£205,000 – £209,999)
Christine Connelly, chief information officer/Director General Dept. of Health (£200,000 – £204,999)
Gabriel Scally, Regional Director of Public Health/Director Dept. of Health (£200,000 – £204,999)
David Behan, Director General of Social Care/Director General Dept. of Health (£180,000 – £184,999)
David Salisbury, director of immunisation Dept. of Health (£175,000 – £179,999)
Lindsey Davies, Regional Director of Public Health/Director, Dept. of Health (£165,000 – £169,999)
Sir Hugh Taylor, permanent secretary Dept. of Health (£155,000 – £159,999)
Martin Bellamy, ICT Director/Director Dept. of Health (£160,000 – £164,999)
Duncan Selbie, Chief Executive    Director General Dept. of Health (£180,000 – £184,999)

The National Health Service budget for building hospitals and buying medical equipment cut by 21%
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/7150026/NHS-building-budget-cut-by-21-per-cent.html

100 hospital jobs go in budget cuts
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/100-hospital-jobs-go-in-budget-cuts-1541513.html

‘David Cameron (current UK Prime Minister) has met a health care pressure group that advocates full privatisation of the National Health Service – a meeting that could infuriate doctors and nurses. The Conservative leader held an hour of talks with the leader of the group Nurses For Reform (NFR) in his private office in the Commons two weeks ago. His decision to meet the radical group, which calls the NHS a “dystopian, Soviet-style calamity”, will be seen as foolhardy after the painstaking efforts he has made to reassure voters that the NHS is safe in Tory hands.’
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/david-cameron/6890179/David-Cameron-meets-NHS-privatisation-campaigners.html

UPDATE: Some of the most common operations  including hip replacements and cataract surgery  will be rationed as part of attempts to save billions of pounds, despite government promises that front-line services would be protected. Patients’ groups have described the measures as “astonishingly brutal”. An investigation has uncovered widespread cuts planned across the NHS, many of which have already been agreed by senior health service officials. They include:

* Restrictions on some of the most basic and common operations, including hip and knee replacements, cataract surgery and orthodontic procedures.

* Plans to cut hundreds of thousands of pounds from budgets for the terminally ill, with dying cancer patients to be told to manage their own symptoms if their condition worsens at evenings or weekends.

* The closure of nursing homes for the elderly.

* A reduction in acute hospital beds, including those for the mentally ill, with targets to discourage GPs from sending patients to hospitals and reduce the number of people using accident and emergency departments.

* Tighter rationing of NHS funding for IVF treatment, and for surgery for
obesity.

* Thousands of job losses at NHS hospitals, including 500 staff to go at a trust where cancer patients recently suffered delays in diagnosis and treatment because of staff shortages.

* Cost-cutting programmes in paediatric and maternity services, care of the elderly and services that provide respite breaks to long-term carers.

The Sunday Telegraph found the details of hundreds of cuts buried in obscure appendices to lengthy policy and strategy documents published by trusts. In most cases, local communities appear to be unaware of the plans.

Dr Peter Carter, the head of the Royal College of Nursing, said he was “incredibly worried” about the disclosures. He urged Andrew Lansley, the Health Secretary, to “get a grip” on the reality of what was going on in the NHS.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/7908742/Axe-falls-on-NHS-services.html

VACCINE SURPLUS FROM 2009 – Canada: $200,000,000+ worth of unused H1N1 vaccine. United States: $455,000,000+ worth of unused H1N1 vaccine. France: approximately $750,000,000 worth of unused H1N1 vaccine supply. Britain: $250,000,000 worth of unused H1N1 vaccine supply (3.8 million doses). Germany: $300,000,000 (approximately 48 million doses wasted). Italy: $260,000,000 worth of H1N1 vaccine supply unused (40 million doses). Netherlands & other Euro countries: comparable waste.

$200,000,000 (Canada)
$455,000,000  (United States)
$750,000,000 (France)
$250,000,000 (Britain)
$300,000,000 (Germany)
$260,000,000 (Italy)
$150,000,000 (Netherlands)
$250,000,000 (Europe misc.)
—————————————————-
$2,500,000,000+ (Conservative total)

CANADA: $200,000,000+ worth of unused H1N1 vaccine (50% of total investment).

Canada ordered 50.4 million doses of H1N1 vaccine costing the taxpayers $400,000,000+ (Most of the order is for adjuvanted  vaccine; 1.8 million of the doses are for unadjuvanted  vaccine). According to Health Canada 45% of Canadians received the shot. 5 million doses were donated to the WHO (to be sent to Africa, Asia & Eastern Europe). Another 5 million doses were “loaned out” to Mexico. The remainder, approximately 20.4 million doses ($150,000,000+) are due to be/or have already been incinerated.
http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2009/08/06/swine-flu-vaccine.html

‘The government purchased 50.4 million doses of H1N1 flu vaccine on behalf of the provinces and vaccinated more than 45 per cent of the country.’
http://www.vancouversun.com/health/Millions+could+wasted+H1N1+vaccine+tossed/2933030/story.html#ixzz0tIbws6ej

‘Canada is donating 10 per cent of its H1N1 vaccine or five millions doses to the World Health Organization to support its global pandemic relief efforts, Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq announced Thursday. The minister noted a Jan. 22 WHO report citing “intense H1N1 flu activity” in recent weeks in North Africa, South Asia and parts of Eastern Europe.’
http://www.healthzone.ca/health/newsfeatures/swineflu/article/757058–canada-donates-surplus-h1n1-vaccine-to-who

‘Ottawa loaned five million doses of vaccine to Mexico in January, on the condition Mexico replenish Canada’s supply months later.’
http://www.vancouversun.com/health/Millions+could+wasted+H1N1+vaccine+tossed/2933030/story.html#ixzz0tIgCKJ6r

UNITED STATES: $260,000,000 worth of unused H1N1 vaccine to be incinerated (40 million doses worth or 25% of overall investment). Another $195,000,000 worth of vaccine supply (30 million doses worth or 43+%) are also soon to expire. The total cost to the taxpayer of unused supply: $455,000,000+

‘About 30 million more doses will expire later and may go unused, according to one government estimate. If all that vaccine expires, more than 43 percent of the supply for the U.S. public will have gone to waste.’
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/nation/ap-impact-millions-of-vaccine-doses-to-be-burned-97569199.html#ixzz0tImsoEu1

‘The US government ordered 250 million doses of pandemic influenza vaccine at a cost of $2 billion. (Stein R. First swine flu vaccine arriving in cities. Washington Post. October 6, 2009.)
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/709468_5

FRANCE: approximately $750,000,000 worth of unused H1N1 vaccine supply (94 million doses costing 1.5 billion dollars).

‘France has joined other European countries in selling off millions of its emergency swine flu vaccines, the government announcing Sunday it had bought far more than needed to fight the outbreak.

“We started with a plan for two-dose vaccinations but since one dose is sufficient we can start to re-sell part of the stock,” a French health ministry official told AFP.

Like Germany, the Netherlands and some other European countries, France has witnessed less demand than expected after spending 869 million euros (1.25 billion dollars) on vaccines for the A(H1N1) virus.

France bought 94 million doses — almost one and a half for every member of the population — but so far only about five million people are recorded as having been vaccinated since the programme was launched in October.’
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jWpBtiyt08M7Za5M8dABAcjf6Qww

BRITAIN: 37.8 million doses of H1N1 vaccine supply unused (approximately $250,000,000 worth).

‘Of the nearly 44m vaccines that the UK has agreed to pay for, 6m have already been used on priority groups and health workers, while 3.8m are being handed to the World Health Organization for Africa. Estimates have put the value of the stockpile at between £100m to £150m, although the government has refused to confirm cost saying it was commercially confidential.’
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8606032.stm

GERMANY: $300,000,000 (approximately 48 million doses wasted).

‘In December, Germany said it was looking to sell off vaccines even though its full order of 50 million doses was not due to be delivered until March. Only about five percent of the population had been vaccinated there.’
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jWpBtiyt08M7Za5M8dABAcjf6Qww

ITALY: $260,000,000 worth of H1N1 vaccine supply unused (40 million doses).

‘In Italy, the health ministry’s head of preventive medicine, Fabrizio Oleari, told the ANSA agency no decision had yet been made on whether to sell excess stock. But Italy had already undertaken to give 10 percent of its stock to poorer countries, he added. So far, only 840,000 of the 48 million doses purchased have been administered.’
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jWpBtiyt08M7Za5M8dABAcjf6Qww

NETHERLANDS: approximately $150,000,000 worth of unused vH1N1 vaccine supply (19 million doses).

‘The Netherlands announced in November that it would sell 19 million of the 34 million vaccines it ordered to countries with a shortage of them,  judging that the danger had passed.’
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jWpBtiyt08M7Za5M8dABAcjf6Qww

According to the World Health Organization vaccines aren’t to blame for the spread of Polio in Nigeria; but rather low vaccine uptake amongst the poorest communities. This despite the fact that, by their own admission, children receiving LIVE POLIO VIRUS DROPS will continue shedding the virus amongst their family & neighbors for weeks to come.

“At the main hospital in Mbarara during that month of 1977 more than 600 children died following polio vaccination.” United Nations

The madness of “herd immunity”, the assumption that by vaccinating (infecting) everyone the herd will somehow maintain overall protection against life threatening diseases & viruses. This inverted logic serves only one agenda, that of a sustained Eugenics directive throughout the Third World. Since the introduction of this program Polio numbers have exploded in these isolated communities. The locals know full well it is Malaria (coupled with crippling poverty, a lack of proper sanitation & nutrition), NOT Polio which presents a genuine threat to their communities.

“In Africa polio does not kill anybody and they say it’s very rare to catch. It’s really very rare to get paralytic polio. They say it’s in very rare circumstances, so what is it that is killing people in Africa? Malaria. Every five seconds a child is dying of malaria in Africa. Now to get the dose of life-saving anti-malaria is about $5 but there is no government to give anti-malaria. When somebody gets malaria, if they have no money they even die. So the question I was asking and many people were asking was ‘If you really want to help children, why begin with a disease that they don’t have?”

Mainstream Media selling UN Propaganda in support of Polio program:

‘A mutated virus from the oral vaccine used to prevent the spread of polio in Nigeria has paralyzed at least 124 children in the West African country this year. The new figure is double the 62 vaccine-derived cases reported in the country last year, and marks the continuation of the longest vaccine-derived polio outbreak ever seen, beginning in 2006, according to Oliver Rosenbauer, spokesman for World Health Organization’s Polio Eradication Initiative.

The oral vaccine contains weakened live polio virus to build immunity in the patient, but can spread from a vaccinated person to the unvaccinated public and grow more virulent. If it is not contained and is allowed to mutate for months, it can grow strong enough to cause paralysis.

“Where you get vaccine-derived cases is in communities where the routine vaccination is very low,” said Robert Scott, chair of the International PolioPlus Committee of the Rotary Foundation. Rotary International, the WHO, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are part of a consortium of groups that support Nigeria’s immunization drive.

“In this particular case in Nigeria, they stopped vaccinating for almost a year, so large areas were unvaccinated,” Scott said.

Nigeria halted its polio vaccination program for more than a year in 2003 because of rumors the vaccine was a conspiracy against Muslims and that it caused infertility. With the encouragement of international health organizations, the country has worked to improve its coverage and implementation of polio vaccinations in recent years, but many remain unvaccinated.’
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/health/july-dec09/polio_08-24.html

WHO/CDC/UNICEF Initiative reveals their own hypocracy & root cause of recent Polio outbreak: ‘As most people infected with poliovirus have no signs of illness, they are never aware they have been infected. After initial infection with poliovirus, the virus is shed intermittently in faeces (excrement) for several weeks. During that time, polio can spread rapidly through the community.’
http://www.polioeradication.org/disease.asp

“I was told by this preacher that when the government introduced the National Immunization Days in 1997, most of the children after vaccination started dying. The preacher told me that they had so much death that his cassock, that he wears to go and conduct the burial ceremony, got old. He said “I buried the children and my cassock got old.” In the same room there was one mother who had four children, and she hid one and took three other children for vaccination, and three children died and that one survived. Now when I went to do my presentation and I asked most of the people who were there – about two, three thousand people – each person had the same story.

At the main hospital in Mbarara during that month of 1977 more than 600 children had died following polio vaccination. 600 children! So even some of the timid medical practitioners who were initially afraid to come out, started coming out giving information and saying ‘Oh, we knew this oral polio vaccine was trouble because as soon as the child receives it, they get a temper- ature and their health goes downhill and there is nothing that you could do.’ “—-Kihura Nkuba (Nov 2002)
http://whale.to/b/genocide_vax_q.html#3._Polio_vaccination_a_killer:_

Money spent on vaccines when clean water and other diseases mostly ignored (45% of UNESCO funds is spent on vaccines):
NB: About 1.2 billion people still have no access to safe drinking water, and 2.4 billion do not have adequate sanitation services. Some 2 million children die every year from water-related diseases. (Ref)

In Africa polio does not kill anybody and they say it’s very rare to catch. It’s really very rare to get paralytic polio. They say it’s in very rare circumstances, so what is it that is killing people in Africa? Malaria. Every five seconds a child is dying of malaria in Africa. Now to get the dose of life-saving anti-malaria is about $5 but there is no government to give anti-malaria. When somebody gets malaria, if they have no money they even die. So the question I was asking and many people were asking was ‘If you really want to help children, why begin with a disease that they don’t have? (applause) Why not look for something that is killing them and save them from what is killing them ?’ And then (inaudible) ‘you know what, I like you very much. I save your children from this killer disease. Now there are no other diseases apart from this rare polio, so let’s go and fight that as well.’ But you don’t begin with the rarest disease and spend all the government’s meagre resources fighting polio, which is not a threat to most people, and then ignore something that is killing them in large numbers like malaria, like AIDS, like cholera, issues to do with sanitation, stunted growth – all the main things that matter to people the government was not fighting. Ugandan Kids Die By 1,000s —A Transcript of a talk given by Kihura Nkuba (Nov 2002) [emphasis added]

“The forcing of them to take a vaccine against a disease they know to be harmless and which they know how to cure in its harmful state was seen as government hell bent on killing its own population for the benefit of commanding white world. Uganda spent nine million of its meager resources marketing this European product (the money spent would have build 120,000 protected water springs giving 30% of the country access to clean water, it would have built ten ultra modern research centers looking at, for example, pests that are threatening the banana crop, but government chose European impose priorities.” “–Kihura Nkuba 2003

“350 million Africans get malaria each year but do not appear to have the right to anti-malarial treatment. 2 million get TB annually yet AIDS spending is 90 times higher than TB spending and there is little left over for treating pneumonias, cancers, parasitics, bacterials or diabetes. What scientific or political justification could there be for this?”
BMJ Rapid Response, 21 December 2003— Dr. John P. Heptonstall, MD, D.Ac., Director, Morley Acupuncture Clinic and Complementary Therapy Centre, Leeds, UK

“The army and the police move house to house looking for children to vaccinate. At the same time, things that kill children like malaria, cholera, issues of stunted growth, sanitation, are completely untackled.”— Kihura Nkuba (Nov 2002)
http://whale.to/b/genocide_vax_q.html#2._Oral_polio_vaccine_contra-indicated_for_immune_deficient_or_HIV_people_according_to_CDC_and_package_inserts:_

Polio Resurgence in Nigeria Traced to Mutating Vaccine
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/11/world/africa/11polio.html?_r=2&oref=slogin

http://www.rense.com/general87/polio.htm
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/health/july-dec09/polio_08-24.html

Post Polio Syndrome
http://www.skally.net/ppsc/ppsc-s.html

UPDATE: The UN (Unicef) are continuing their misguided Polio program by reaching out to war ravaged communities in Iraq.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2774951.stm

“The Salk vaccine failed completely. And the Sabin vaccine was a disaster. It caused many cases of polio and showed no relationship to the disease except for an increase in polio during the early ’60s, caused by the vaccine itself. And now we have the sensational findings from the Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, which strongly indicate that polio did not go away at all, but now manifests itself as chronic fatigue syndrome.

When the Coxsackie viruses were first isolated from CFS patients, it wasn’t realized that we were simply dealing with a new form of polio. This new polio was caused by the replacement of the polio viruses with their brothers, the Coxsackie viruses. As the researchers didn’t get the connection at first, these new polio cases were labled “post-polio syndrome,” “chronic fatigue syndrome,” and “myalgic encephalomyelitis.”" William Douglass MD
http://www.whale.to/m/douglas9.html

‘Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (abbreviated ME) is a chronic, inflammatory, primarily neurological disease that is multisystemic, affecting the central nervous system (CNS), immune system and cardiovascular system, the endocrinological system and musculoskeletal system. ME can cause a wide variety of symptoms, including changes in sensory tolerance, visual problems, exertional muscle weakness, difficulties with coordination and speech, severe fatigability, cognitive impairment, problems with balance, subnormal or poor body temperature control (due to circulation issues) and severe pain. ME will cause a degree of impaired mobility and disability in all cases. The degree of impairment and complexity depends on the degree of diffuse brain injury and end organ involvement.

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis affects the brain and spinal cord which control the body, allow thought and sensory processing, causing dysautonomia, impaired thinking and loss of internal homeostasis, the process whereby the body maintains a consistent internal environment in response to external stressors. Cellular metabolism and communication is disrupted, causing inefficiency in all biological processes. This includes the cellular mitochondria which process fuel to make energy, resulting in a deficiency of adenosine-triphosphate ATP with a chronic, severe, measurable loss of sustainable strength on exertion. A hallmark of ME is intolerance to previously trivial effort and deterioration through persistent or repeated exertion (often resulting in relapse).’
http://www.disapedia.com/index.php?title=Myalgic_Enc

Salk cultured live Polio virus in diseased African Green Monkey kidneys (SV40 Patent). It was supposedly attenuated with formaldehyde & the heat treatment process to render the virus safe from harm. History has proven their method was far from foolproof as the virus component was not sufficiently “killed off”. Based on my understanding the problem was never fixed.

‘Some 50 to 65 monkeys will be used in a single morning. Under an anaesthetic a surgeon removes the kidneys, after which the monkey is killed by an overdose of ether. Then the kidneys are cut into tiny pieces and placed in glass bottles with a special nutrient solution (No 199) devised by Dr. Salk. These bottles are then rocked in a mechanical machine for six days in an incubator to stimulate the growth of the kidney cells.

At this stage fluid containing live polio virus is introduced and the bottles again rocked. After about four days the virus has multiplied a thousandfold in the kidney cells and is now chilled in 21 gallon bottles ready for transportation from Toronto to Eli Lilly & Co, and Parke, Davis & Co. There the brew is filtered free from the kidney cells (which might cause nephritis if injected into a human being) and diluted with formaldehyde to kill the virus.

As we have already seen, there are three main strains of polio virus, against all of which there is need for protection. Consequently three tankfuls each containing one type of virus, cultivated and killed in the above manner, are mixed together. After neutralising the formaldehyde with sodium bisulphite there begins a month-long process of testing to see if the vaccine is safe for injection into human beings. This necessitates inoculations into live monkeys, rabbits, guinea-pigs and mice. These tests are carried out simultaneously, on each batch issued, by Dr. Salk’s laboratories and by the National Institute of Health at Bethesda, Maryland. Having passed the final tests the vaccine is distributed in little glass bottles for inoculation into children.

The majority of the cases followed inoculation with the Cutter brand of the Salk vaccine, but the subsequent reports of laboratory tests were at first conflicting: The Minister of Health declared, in answer to a question in the House of Commons (June 17. 1955). that “No explanation for the Cutter vaccine incident has yet been found, but it is possible that certain batches contained live virus.” The Lancet (June 11, 1955. p. 1207) stated in a leading article that “the most likely explanation is that some of the vaccine contained live poliomyelitis virus which had not been completely inactivated by the formaldehyde treatment.” At any rate, in contrast to one report speaking of failure to isolate the virus from the Cutter vaccine- a purely negative laboratory result- –a more convincing report by Dr. Louis P. Gebhardt. Professor of bacteriology and Director of poliomyelitis Research Laboratory in the University of Utah, asserted that he had found live virus in samples of Cutter vaccine. This was confirmed by Dr. Scheele in a statement on television.

The report issued by the United States Public health Service (Lancet, June I8, 1955) contains the definite statement, amidst much that is rather wordy, vague and technical, that during manufacture the formalin used for inactivation often failed to reach minute particles of live virus. This, together with several other circumstances connected with the development of the disease among the inoculated children, led them to conclude that the Cutter vaccine may have contained live virus. There can be little doubt that in fact it did.

It was also revealed in this report that several of the six manufacturers licensed to make the Salk vaccine had the daunting experience of finding active virus-—in one instance in four out of six batches tested– –in the vaccine, when it should have been safe and ready for use.

In the course of the investigations into the manufacture of the Cutter vaccine, it transpired that instead of tests being made upon every batch of vaccine before its issue, only “spot ” checks had been made. This would appear, face on the face of it, to be a most culpable omission amid one deserving the severest censure. At all events the experts of the United States Public Health Service, who carried out the inquiry into the manufacture, testing. and distribution of the cutter vaccine after this most humiliating fiasco that brought suffering and anxiety in millions of American homes insisted upon the application of most stringent safety measures before any more of this vaccine, and indeed of any of the various firms’ vaccines, could be issued for general use. Time (June 6, 1955) pungently commented: “The more the authorities congratulated themselves on the new tests, the more (by implication at least) did they condemn the old.”

It is by no means reassuring to learn that Dr. Scheele, the American Surgeon General is reported in the New York Times (June 8. 1955) as telling the American Medical Association, at a meeting at Atlantic City, that the Salk vaccine is difficult to make and that no batch can ever be proved safe before it is given to children.

The explanation of this somewhat startling pronouncement is to be found in a statement made by the city health commissioner of Milwaukee. Wisconsin, in May 1955, when referring to the safety tests made on monkeys. He said: ” Monkey tissues are not necessarily comparable to human tissues in this respect. This is exemplified by the fact that the amount of inactivated virus necessary to produce a good polio anti-body response in humans is far less than that needed in monkeys.” In other words the monkey is not so sensitive in the presence of virus as is the human being.

Dr. Scheele also announced (Lancet. June 4, 1955) and the reader must do his best to reconcile the two statements–the safety of all Salk vaccines produced by the other American firms, and it was expected that the mass immunisation of children would begin again shortly. It had been the intention of the Government to inoculate 57 million people before August 1955.’
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/bayly.html

Polio was on the decline well before the vaccine program was introduced. That quickly changed however with a rapid spike in numbers in 1954.

‘1954 Polio rate caused by the vaccine accelerates ten-fold in Massachusetts.

1954 Eli Lilly company begins renovation of a five-story building in Indianapolis in July 1954 for the production of Salk vaccine. It is in full production by October of 1954. Wyeth, Parke-Davis and others follow suit…. See More

According to the ACS, they are predicting 6.4 million deaths from cancer, compared with 128,000 in 1933 – an increase of 6.2 million cases in 22 years. Vaccination, pesticide use and chemical pollution are the main factors that have increased since 1933.

1955 Despite the skyrocketing cases of vaccine-induced polio, the AMA, NFIP and USPHS claim a reduction of 40-50%.

1955 Idaho brings its Salk vaccination program to a halt on July 1, 1955. Utah does the same on July 12, 1955.

1955 Vermont reports a 266% increase in polio since vaccinations began in 1954.

1955 Rhode Island reports 454% increase in polio since vaccinations in 1954.

1955 Massachusetts reports 642% increase in polio since vaccinations began in 1954 with vaccination of 130,000 children. In response, the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis states that the increase in cases was due to the fact that “no children were vaccinated there.” Massachusetts bans the sale of Salk vaccine.”

1955 Dr. Graham W. Wilson, director of Britains Public Health Laboratory Service, who knew about the NIH Salk vaccine trials, says “I do not see how any vaccine prepared by Salk’s method can be guaranteed safe.”

1955 US Surgeon General Scheele admits in a closed session of the AMA that “Salk polio vaccine is hard to make and no batch can be proven safe before given to children”. Despite this fact, the public is told that the vaccine is safe. The government announces that it has the intention to vaccinate 57 million people before August 1955.’
http://www.relfe.com/history_2.html

In 1977, Dr Jonas Salk who developed the first polio vaccine, testified along with other scientists, that mass inoculation against polio was the cause of most polio cases throughout the USA
since 1961. (Science 4/4/77 “Abstracts” – Control of influenza and poliomyelitis with killed virus vaccines) http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/search?src=hw&site_area=sci&fulltext=dr.+salk+%2B+1977&x=0&y=0

“Live virus vaccines against influenza and paralytic polio, for example, may in each instance cause the disease it is intended to prevent… ”
http://www.novaccine.com/authorities-speakout/index.asp?s=2&p=4

“”Millions of people have been inoculated with anti-polio vaccine contaminated with tumoral SV40 virus.” (Present in the green monkey cells ground to produce the vaccine.) “It is possible that it will take 20 or more years before the eventual harmful effects of the vaccine will manifest itself.” , Denmark, 1973 ”
Prof. Clausen, Director of the Institute of Preventative Medicine at the University of Odense, Denmark, — 1/1/1973

The United Nations which overseas the WHO has been implicated in the promotion of live viruses & eugenics-type sterilization programs throughout the past, based on verifiable data.

National Security Council Document 20506: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests -

This 1974 memorandum drafted by Henry Kissinger led directly to the unleashing of experimental vaccines on the unsuspecting public. It sighted countries as targets for “initial population reduction experimentation to be implemented around the year 2000″. They identified India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia & Columbia for study. 3 million Filipinos ages 12-48 were given a test vaccine that ruined their health. North American Black & Native American Women were each given the same vaccine resulting in sterility rates of 25% & 35% respectively. The directive came from the WHO and was directly tied to Kissinger’s report.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/6474391/Henry-Kissinger-Population-Control-Document
http://www.danielestulin.com/ver.php?id=160
http://www.danielestulin.com/ver.php?id=161

It followed a 1972 report (Bulletin #47) issued by the World Health Organization which referred to an immune virus requested which would selectively destroy the Human T Cell System, to be distributed in conjunction with a Nationwide vaccination program “to observe the results”.

Memo 1:http://drcarley.com/pdf/WHO_Memo_1_searchable.pdf
Memo 2:http://drcarley.com/pdf/WHO_Memo_2_Searchable.pdf

This coincided precisely with the extensive Small Pox vaccination program in central Africa – shortly preceding the outbreak of Aids in Africa, America & elsewhere. The determining factor most common in Aids victims is the breakdown of the T Cell System in the body. Another coincidence.

VRM: Polio Scam
http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=814

Vaccine Resistance Movement is a grass roots, non-profit organization striving for safe alternatives to vaccines; both empowering citizens around the world with the means of self sufficiency while determined to expose vaccine fraud & pharmaceutical industry malfeasance. This study is the culmination of two years of inspired research, energized with the support of a growing community of responsible activists learning how to stand independent of Corporate & Gov’t misdirection.

Direct link to study: http://study.vaccineresistancemovement.org/

It is our goal, through this study, to determine an accurate percentage of those unvaccinated autistic children & adults vs. those unvaccinated children & adults who have not become autistic. Essentially what we are trying to identify is the healthy trend in unvaccinated children & adults. Based on the Centre For Disease Control’s ‘Recommended Immunization Schedule for Persons Aged 0 Through 6 Years—United States • 2010′ we are also charting the common denominators in those vaccinated children & adults who became autistic (ie. vaccines received, dietary issues, family health problems, breast/bottle feeding) vs. those vaccinated children & adults who did not become autistic (diet, family health history cross referenced, breast/bottle feeding). As this is a worldwide census type study it is felt the CDC 0-6 model comes closest to an official standard to which most nations subcribe. Variables nation-nation (ie. particulars of vaccine schedule) will be noted accordingly. An ‘Additional Comments’ category will accompany each section for any discrepancies.

Our study will include ADD/ADHD as co-factors of autism. While not officially linked diagnostically the similarities between Attention Deficit Disorder/Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Autism spectrum disorders, (especially Asperger’s Syndrome) such as delayed social & motor skills, plus extreme sensitivity to sensory stimuli, the same deficiencies that autism has suggests a commonality of symptoms. Boys are also four times more likely to have ADHD and four times more likely to have autism than girls.

Many researchers have also determined a strong correlation between autism & diet. While there is certainly controversy over the merits of this argument our study will encompass diet as a primary co-factor (ie. use of sugar, iodized salt, gluten, casein, poly-saturated fats).

In order to guarantee accuracy of the data acquired study participants must allow for access to family medical records (*Note: only in cases where autism has occurred). This disclosure will be entirely confidential in nature and at the discretion of the study organizers. Any shared information will be used strictly to confirm an autism diagnosis. No data beyond that which the family agrees to disclose shall be included in the study results.

All participants in this study will be designated a number to assure complete anonymity. Any sensitive information including family names, personal references, e-mail addresses etc will be inaccessible to the public. Only study administrators will be privy to access. Contact will remain exclusively confidential between participants & VRM. At any time a participant may withdraw from the study group; whereupon their data will be returned to them and/or destroyed.

To summarize: The purpose of this worldwide study is to determine the incidence/rate of autism amongst those unvaccinated children & adults surveyed. We are also concurrently tracking the incidence/rate of autism amongst those vaccinated children & adults surveyed; cross-referencing dietary factors, pre-existing medical conditions/allergies, family health/vaccine history (multiple generations), breast/bottle feeding, We hope to gain new insights into the causality & manifestations of autism with an exhaustive, scientific approach.

NOTE: All age groups & nationalities are being considered in this study. Families may include every member of the household. Parents representing their child/children are asked to provide the current age of child in question and as many pertinent details as possible throughout the survey. Otherwise please apply your own adult case history to the survey. One participant per survey. Any questions pertaining to the parameters or any other aspects of the study please contact VRM Administration : http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?page_id=9

Your financial contributions, regardless of the amount, will help finance the whole operation; from development stages to worldwide promotion, ultimately to charting, logging, & cross-referencing the deluge of study responses anticipated. This is an exciting, groundbreaking project, one we feel will help redefine society’s understanding of the paths that lead to Autism. Donations are needed now to complete this ambitious undertaking (see Paypal link).

Registration is required to participate in this study: Register now

Joel Lord/Founder of Vaccine Resistance Movement

Contact Us: http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?page_id=9

———————————————————————————————————————————————————

VRM: As part of the  ongoing research we’ll be cataloging your questions/comments -

“I have two kids (4 1/2 y/o son and 2 1/2 y/o daughter) who have never been vaccinated and are not autistic.”

“Well I’ve got three unvaccinated healthy (non autistic) children.  All boys (6, 4, and 2).”

“I have 2 boys. My eldest, Eric received only one vaccine: the hep B when he was 28 minutes old (and having been born 3 weeks early). Prior to the shot, his APGAR was 9. Following the shot, he immediately ended up in NICU. He screamed, arching his back and writhing for 3 days. You can see how swollen his head was in the pics I took while he was in NICU. They tried to hide the fact that he had received the vaccine because they gave the shot without consent. I was originally told he had aspirated amniotic fluid and had pneumonia, yet there was no coughing, and how does a newborn with pneumonia scream so much that the nurses complain?! He has diagnoses of autism, PDD, ataxic cerebral palsy, and absence seizures. He also has severe allergies to peanuts and eggs. He is intolerant to gluten and dairy and soy triggers seizures.

I gave birth to his brother in 2008. We did not allow any vaccines, the vitamin K injection or the eye ointment. He is almost 20 months old now, has 130 words and counting, no allergies, and is rarely even ill. He shows absolutely no signs of any autism, developmental delay, etc.

Just a footnote…we have found no autism/developmental delays in either my husband’s or my family, but both families, especially mine, have a strong history of auto-immune disorders, mostly rheumatoid arthritis, type 1 and 2 diabetes and lupus. I’m interested in keeping up with how this study goes.”

“My daughter has been vaccine injured even though she only received the first two vaccines…we weren’t going to vaccinate her to begin with. But seeing that she was born sick and had her first 4 surgeries under the age of 2, the doctors and nurses at the Stollery gave us scare tactics, so we vaccinated her at 3 months 5 months. The biggest regret in my life! She missed all her milestones. So now I’m working on a detox and chelation to get the metals out of her body…so far so good. She was born September of 2005. We live in Edmonton Alberta Canada. If you need more info please email me. Good luck and I’m in your corner, these pharmacutical companies need to be stopped! If your body is in an AKALINE STATE there in no room for sickness! An ACIDIC body causes sickness and illnesses. SAY NO TO DAIRY, MEAT, NON OR PERSCRIPTION DRUGS…EAT GREEN AND LIVE AN RAW LIFE!”

“Does vaccination issues skip a generation? I was vaccinated, but my children were not, will bad effects be seen in my grandchildren?”

“I don’t see how vac. issues can skip a generation, i mean ya there ur blood but if u didn’t carry them for 9 mo and give birth and breast feed them, then how would they get any of the toxins from ur body…lol just don’t make sense…”

“I think it would be important to include somehow (or maybe a side study) if the participants were breastfed, and if so how long. Seems to be an important factor.”

“For the Philippines it would be good to examine groups of both vaccinated and unvaccinated children from rural communities, indigenous communities, working/middle class communities and urban poor communities. Do we know anyone who could cover some of the costs? I’m starting a new organisation here in the Philippines – Vaccine Information Philippines – and maybe we can be a part of this research. One of our agendas is to spread information about vaccinations to the indigenous people here that has not yet been targeted by vaccinations. We have dedicated people but we miss the finances – let me know if this is interesting.”

“One Vax vs. UnVax study which could be conducted would use adults in lieu of children. Having done everything in my power to educate the NY State Legislators, the majority of them have ignored me. I propose that all the legislators who have voted in favor of increased and mandated vaccines be vaccinated with them and all those who voted… See More against them, not be vaccinated. Although they have a far greater chance of surviving vaccination as adults, I do believe that there will be a significant differential with regard to wellness. I’m sure that they would approve of this. How else could they have approved them for children?”

“In New Zealand in the 50s /60s one of the vaccines has been associated with adults having high rates of Non Hodgkins Lymphoma. It was proven. Two of my 4 brothers developed this type of lymphoma and both were vaccinated. I also know someone whose bother also got it, and was born in that same generation, although she is an incredibly strong vaccine supporter and rather passionately anti non-vaccinators.”

“Would love to participate! Have a 4 1/2 year son with autism, and a NT unvax daughter! No ASD on either side of the family until my son was born!”

“I know a kid who was perfectly fine and minutes after receiving a vaccine completely lost himself and became autistic. Minutes!”

“Find out if the mother was vaccinated while pregnant +/or had amalgam fillings +/or breastfed.”

“Is this just autism or Aspergers Syndrome as well?”

SCIENTIFIC STUDIES & STERILITY:

‘Exposure of pregnant mice to oestrogen has been shown to impair Leydig-cell development as well as reducing Sertoli cell number as outlined previously. Oestrogens negatively regulate Leydig-cell development via inhibition of Leydig precursor cell replication. This results in a decrease in testosterone production and thus reduced masculinisation in the animal, this is reflected by a reduction in sperm production. Recent research has shown that many man made chemicals (i.e. Bisphenal A Plastics) can act as weak oestrogens (xeno-oestrogens), mimicking in part the actions of our own natural hormones directly and indirectly. These chemicals are present in the plastic lining of food cans, in pesticides, in plastics and in paints. In laboratories many designed chemicals have been shown to have oestrogenic effects. Oestrogen receptors allow many hundreds of different chemicals to bind to them. In some cases the chemicals have structures so dissimilar to that of the bodies natural oestradiol that they would never normally be thought of as having hormonal activity. These chemicals are very weak oestrogens, but if given in high enough amounts they can activate oestrogen receptors in much the same way as natural hormones do.

Professor Niels Skakkeback, a Danish scientist and his team in the Department of Growth and Development at Copenhagen University had reviewed 61 international studies involving 14,947 men between 1938 and 1992. They found that the average sperm count had fallen from 113 million per millilitre in 1940 to 66 million in 1990. In addition, the definition of a “normal” sperm count fell from 60 million per millilitre to 20 million in the same period.

Subsequent studies have confirmed and strengthened Skakkebaek’s findings. A survey of 1,350 sperm donors in Paris found a decline in sperm counts by around 2% each year over the past 23 years, with younger men having the poorest-quality semen. In another study at the University of Helsinki led by Jarkko Farjarinen, testicular tissue was examined at post-mortem from 528 middle-aged Finnish men who died suddenly in either 1981 or 1991. Among the men who died in 1981, 56.4% had normal, healthy sperm production. By 1991, however, this figure had dropped dramatically to 26.9%. The average weight of the men’s testes decreased over the decade, while the proportion of useless fibrous testicular tissue increased. Adamopoulos et al in Athens examined 23,850 men between 1977 to 1993 (17 years) and found similar results to Farjarinen. In Edinburgh a recent study by Irwin saw a 50% decrease in sperm count over 40 years.’

SODIUM FLUORIDE & STERILITY:

‘High doses of fluoride have repeatedly been found to interfere with the reproductive system of animals. Commonly observed effects in fluoride-exposed animals include: oxidative stress, damaged sperm, reduced sperm count, and reduced fertility.

According to the authors of a recent study in the journal Reproductive Toxicology:

“We conclude that fluoride treatment is associated with testicular disorders, which may be due to induction of oxidative stress in reproductive organs along with possible adverse effects of fluoride on pituitary testicular axis.The detailed mechanism of fluoride treatment on the male reproductive system has not been elucidated and will be the subject of future experiments ” (Ghosh et al 2002).

“A few human studies suggested that high concentrations of fluoride exposure might be associated with alterations in reproductive hormones, effects on fertility, and developmental outcomes, but design limitations make those studies insufficient for risk evaluation.”
SOURCE: National Research Council. (2006). Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Scientific Review of EPA’s Standards. National Academies Press, Washington D.C. p 6.

“A review of fluoride toxicity showed decreased fertility in most animal species studied. The current study was to see whether fluoride would also affect human birth rates. A U.S. database of drinking water systems was used to identify index counties with water systems reporting fluoride levels of at least 3 ppm. These and adjacent counties were grouped in 30 regions spread over 9 states… Most regions showed an association of decreasing TFR [Total Fertility Rate] with increasing fluoride levels. Meta-analysis of the region-specific results confirmed that the combined result was a negative TFR/fluoride association with a consensus combined p value of .0002-.0004, depending on the analytical scenario. There is no evidence that this outcome resulted from selection bias, inaccurate data, or improper analytical methods. However, the study is one that used population means rather than data on individual women. Whether or not the fluoride effect on the fertility rate found at the county level also applies to individual women remains to be investigated.”
SOURCE: Freni SC. (1994). Exposure to high fluoride concentrations in drinking water is associated with decreased birth rates. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health 42:109-121.

“There are no published reports in the literature on reproductive toxicity of fluoride in men. However, two Russian studies showed that chronic occupational exposure to fluoride-contaminated compounds might affect reproductive function. Men who had worked in the cryolite industry for 10-25 years and who demonstrated clinical skeletal fluorosis showed decreases in circulating testosterone and compensatory increases in follicle-stimulating hormone when compared with controls (Tokar and Savchenko, 1977). Of the exposed men, those exposed to cryolite for 16-25 years had increased luteinizing-hormone levels as compared with men exposed for 10-15 years. Women exposed occupationally to air heavily laden with superphosphates demonstrated increases in menstrual irregularities and genital irritations when compared with unexposed controls (Kuznetzova, 1969). However, occupational exposure to many other compounds in the cryolite and superphosphate industries makes it difficult to implicate any one substance, such as fluoride, in inducing these health effects. A recent study of women employed in silicon water manufacturing (fabrication room workers) showed a relative risk of spontaneous abortion of 1.45 times that of women (of the same ages) who worked in nonfabrication rooms (Schenker et al., 1992). The overall increase in risk ranged from about 20 to 40%. There was a dose-response relationship and a consistency of findings for persons exposed to on specific class of solvents. Spontaneous abortions were also associated with fluoride exposure but only in one work group, and a strong dose-response was not present. The authors characterized the fluoride-associated increase in relative risk of spontaneous abortions as ‘less consistent’ than the results of exposure to some solvents in this study and ‘less consistent’ with other research.”
SOURCE: National Research Council. (1993). Health effects of ingested fluoride. Report of the Subcommittee on Health Effects of Ingested Fluoride. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. p. 73-74.

Prozac (FLUoxetene Hydrochloride) and Sarin nerve gas (Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl FLUoride)
http://www.preferrednetwork.com/FLUORIDE_STUPIDITY.htm

“The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben” by Joseph Borkin
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_igfa

GMO FOOD & STERILITY

‘A long-term multi generational feeding study commissioned by the Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, carried out by Veterinary University Vienna in November 2008, confirms that feeding mice with genetically modified corn developed by the US-based Monsanto Corporation led to lower fertility and body weight. Lead author of the study Professor Zentek said that there was a direct link between the decrease in fertility and the GM diet, and that mice fed with non-GE corn reproduced more efficiently.

In the study, Austrian scientists performed several long-term feeding trials over 20 weeks with laboratory mice fed a diet containing 33% of a GM variety (NK 603 x MON 810), and a closely related non-GE variety used in many countries. Statistically significant litter size and pup weight decreases were found in the third and fourth litters in the GM-fed mice, compared to the control group.’
http://www.responsibletechnology.org/utility/showArticle/?objectID=2468

A new study done by Russian scientists suggests that Genetically Modified Food may cause long term sterility, that is, sterility in second and third generations. The scientists used hamsters for this research and divided them into groups. One group of hamsters was fed a normal diet without any soy products, a second group was fed non-GMO (genetically modified organism) soy, the third ate GM soy and the fourth group was fed an even higher amount of GM soy than the third.

Each group produced about seven to eight litters of baby hamsters each without any problems. But when the researchers selected new breeding pairs from the offspring, the second generation had a slower growth rate and reached their sexual maturity later than normal. They also had a mortality rate, five times higher than the hamsters who didn’t eat soy. Even more shocking was the fact that nearly all of the third generation GM soy eating hamsters were sterile and also experienced hair growing inside their mouths.
http://www.infowars.com/research-links-genetically-modified-food-to-long-term-sterility/

Non GMO food guide for daily use. Invaluable download.
http://www.nongmoshoppingguide.com/documentFiles/144.pdf

VACCINES & AUTO-IMMUNE DISRUPTION:

Vaccines interfere directly with the Immune, Endocrine, Lymphatic & Nervous Systems of the body. Most vaccines are laced with 2 forms of Aluminum (directly linked to early onset Alzheimer’s Disease, Macrophagic Myofasciitis, chronic fatigue syndrome) & Thimerosal Mercury, a devastating neurotoxin implicated in the explosive spread of autism, now at 1 in 67 & linked to psychological, neurological & immunological problems. Heavy metals eventually collect in the brain and linger there for decades, upwards of a lifetime.

Studies have shown that mercury is taken up in the periphery by all nerve endings and rapidly transported inside the axon of the nerves (axonal transport) to the spinal cord & brainstem. Unless actively removed, mercury has an extremely long half-life of somewhere between 15 and 30 years in the central nervous system. Hair analysis showed mercury levels to be 20,000 higher in those with cardiac abnormalities.

Studies also reveal that the level of mercury in the umbilical cord blood of newborns is 1.7 times higher than the mercury level in their mother’s blood.

“The search for the association between mercury and cardiovascular disease reveals 358 scientific papers exemplifying the relationship; between mercury & cancer we find 643 scientific papers. The association of mercury with neurodegenerative diseases is the most significant, with the references numbering 1,445.

It has been shown that mercury rapidly depletes the immune system. Mercury has also been shown to induce auto-immune diseases. Anything that depletes and disturbs the immune system will increase one’s chances of contracting cancer. Mercury binds with hemoglobin, which is responsible for oxygen transport to the tissues. This results in less oxygen reaching the tissues when the body is polluted with mercury. We don’t have to look far in understanding how a heavy metal like mercury can eventually lead one to cancer’s door.” Dr. Rashid Buttar/Center for Advanced Medicine & Clinical Research

“Heavy metals & viruses in vaccines cause abnormal development in brain, long-term changes that put a child at high risk of neuro-degenerative diseases ie. Parkinson’s & Alzheimer’s for the rest of their life; also they become hyper-sensitive to environmental toxins (Pesticides, Herbicides). Live viruses in vaccines are incorporated into your genetic material & passed on to your children. Many rare forms of cancer are now very common ie Pancreatic cancer. Lymphoma is now the number one malignancy in 30 year olds and rising. Asthma has seen a ten fold increase over last 2 decades. Type 1 Diabetes has also been linked to auto-immune disorder caused by vaccines.” Dr. Russell Blaylock

“Some vaccines, including the MMR, smallpox, and chickenpox vaccines, contain live viruses. By giving three and sometimes four live viruses together, the risk of developing a lifetime viral infection (a persistent viral infection) increases tremendously. This is especially so with the MMR vaccine, which contains two live viruses known to suppress the immune system for months.” Dr. Russell Blaylock

“Most people fail to realize all vaccines carry a list of ingredients that typically increase human disease and death (i.e., morbidity and mortality). These include toxic elements and chemicals such as mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde and formalin (used to preserve corpses), MSG, foreign genetic material, and risky proteins from various species of bacteria, viruses, and animals that have been scientifically associated with triggering autoimmune disorders and certain cancers. A growing body of scientific evidence strongly suggests vaccines are largely responsible for increasing cases of autism and other learning disabilities, chronic fatigue, fibromyalgia, Lupus, MS, ALS, rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, hay fever, allergies, chronic draining ear infections, type 1 autoimmune diabetes, and many, many more pandemics. These chronic ailments are said to require long-term medical care for the patients’ management causing toxic side effects resulting in America’s leading killer–iatrogenic disease. That is, vaccines and other pharmaceutical industry inventions are literally killing or disabling millions with little effort on the part of government officials and their drug industry cohorts to arrest this scourge.” Dr. Leonard Howowitz

FORCED STERILIZATION:

“Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.”
John Holdren/Obama’s Science Zsar, Ecoscience P.787-788

“A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.”
Ecoscience P.786-787

“The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”
Ecoscience P.786-787

“If some individuals contribute to general social deterioration by overproducing children, and if the need is compelling, they can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility—just as they can be required to exercise responsibility in their resource-consumption patterns—providing they are not denied equal protection.”
Ecoscience P.838

“A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion. At the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would be possible.”
United Nations/Global Biodiversity Assessment

“A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people. We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions.”
Prof Paul Ehrlich/The Population Bomb

“… the resultant ideal sustainable population is hence more than 500 million but less than one billion.” Club of Rome/Goals for Mankind

FEDERAL CHILD ABDUCTION PROCEDURES – ‘Under the radical new government policy, would-be mothers who are 20 weeks or more pregnant are being forced to give urine samples – to show they are drug free – and prove they have permanent accommodation. If the expectant mother fails to satisfy child-protection officers, they immediately start child removal procedures. It means the paperwork is completed ahead of the birth and, as soon as a baby is born, the child can be put into state care or given to a relative.’

SECRET BIOCHEMICAL TESTING ON BRITISH CITIZENS: ‘The UK Ministry of Defence turned large parts of the country into a giant laboratory to conduct a series of secret germ warfare tests on the public. A government report just released provides for the first time a comprehensive official history of Britain’s biological weapons trials between 1940 and 1979. Many of these tests involved releasing potentially dangerous chemicals and micro-organisms over vast swaths of the population without the public being told. Some families in areas which bore the brunt of the secret tests are convinced the experiments have led to their children suffering birth defects, physical handicaps and learning difficulties.’

CHEMTRAILS (Stratospheric Aerosal Geo-engineering): No matter where you live you are now breathing Ethylene Dibromide, nano-particlates of Aluminum, Barium & Cationic Polymer Fibers with unidentified bioactive material. Long term chronic exposure to such toxins destroys the body’s Immune System leaving you vulnerable to serious infection, disease & death. Based on the history of Government & Military sanctioned experimentation on the citizenry it is likely that sterilants are also deliberately being added as part of this program.

HEALTH MATTERS: http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=825

A stunning new report reveals that top scientists who convinced the World Health Organization to declare H1N1 a global pandemic held close financial ties to the drug companies that profited from the sale of those vaccines. This report, published in the British Medical Journal, exposes the hidden ties that drove WHO to declare a pandemic, resulting in billions of dollars in profits for vaccine manufacturers.

“For WHO, its credibility has been badly damaged. WHO must act now to restore its credibility.” Fiona Godlee, Editor of British Medical Journal (BMJ)

“The idea that we declared a pandemic when there wasn’t a pandemic is both historically inaccurate and downright irresponsible,” said WHO spokesman Gregory Hartl in a telephone interview. “There is no doubt that this was a pandemic. To insinuate that this was not a pandemic is very disrespectful to the people who died from it.” WHO spokesman Gregory Hartl
http://www.naturalnews.com/028936_WHO_vaccines.htm

“Potential conflicts of interest are inherent in any relationship between a normative and health development agency, like WHO, and a profit-driven industry. Similar considerations apply when experts advising the Organization have professional links with pharmaceutical companies. Numerous safeguards are in place to manage possible conflicts of interest or their perception.” WHO SPIN

“The problem is not so much that communicating uncertainty is difficult, but that uncertainty was not communicated. There was no scientific basis for the WHO’s estimate of 2 billion for likely H1N1 cases, and we knew little about the benefits and harms of the vaccination. The WHO maintained this 2 billion estimate even after the winter season in Australia and New Zealand showed that only about one to two out of 1000 people were infected. Last but not least, it changed the very definition of a pandemic.” Gerd Gigerenzer, director of the Centre for Adaptive Behaviour and Cognition at the Max Planck Institute in Germany

Influenza Pandemic Plan: The Role of WHO and Guidelines for National and Regional Planning
http://www.wpro.who.int/NR/rdonlyres/A7C42115-DF0F-48CF-82AF-DDE0D734994E/0/InfluenzaPandemicPlan.pdf

Objectives of Influenza Pandemic Plan: To “take measures to encourage the pharmaceutical industry to plan its vaccine/antivirals production capacity in advance”, to “encourage and support research and development of pandemic vaccine” and to “develop a policy for antiviral stockpiling.” It also added that government representatives needed to know that “influenza vaccination and use of antivirals is beneficial and safe.” It said that the group provided “evidence based, palatable information”; and also “networking/exchange with other stakeholders (eg, with industry in order to establish pandemic vaccine and antivirals contracts).

WHO Guidelines on the Use of Vaccines and Antivirals during Influenza Pandemics 2004. The specific guidance on antivirals WHO Guidelines on the Use of Vaccines and Antivirals during Influenza Pandemics 2004. (Section of note: The specific guidance on antivirals, Considerations for the Use of Antivirals During an Influenza Pandemic)
http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/influenza/11_29_01_A.pdf

Scientists on the double dipping payroll include:

1) Dr.René Snacken/Belgian Ministry of Public Health, WHO Division of Viral Diseases (1998), Co-author of ‘Influenza Pandemic Plan: The Role of WHO and Guidelines for National and Regional Planning’ (1999), also funded researcher for Roche (Tamiflu)

2) Dr Daniel Lavanchy/Co-author of ‘Influenza Pandemic Plan: The Role of WHO and Guidelines for National and Regional Planning’ (1999),  appeared at a Roche sponsored symposium in 1998 while employed at WHO Division of Viral Diseases.

3) Professor Karl Nicholson/Leicester University, UK, Member of The European Scientific Working Group on Influenza (ESWI) which collaborated with WHO on ‘Influenza Pandemic Plan: The Role of WHO and Guidelines for National and Regional Planning’, co-author of ‘WHO Guidelines on the Use of Vaccines and Antivirals during Influenza Pandemics 2004′ (author of the third annex, Pandemic Influenza), also on Roche pharmaceutical Company Payroll, conducted a randomised controlled trial on oseltamivir (Tamiflu) supported by Roche and also received travel sponsorship and honorariums from GlaxoSmithKline and Roche for consultancy work and speaking at international respiratory and infectious diseases symposiums.

4) Professor Abe Osterhaus/Erasmus University, Netherlands, Member of The European Scientific Working Group on Influenza (ESWI) which collaborated with WHO on ‘Influenza Pandemic Plan: The Role of WHO and Guidelines for National and Regional Planning’, also conducted a randomised controlled trial on oseltamivir (Tamiflu) supported by Roche.

5) Professor Fred Hayden, University of Virginia, co-author of ‘WHO Guidelines on the Use of Vaccines and Antivirals during Influenza Pandemics 2004′ (Section titled ‘The specific guidance on antivirals, Considerations for the Use of Antivirals During an Influenza Pandemic’), was being paid by Roche for lectures and consultancy work for the company at the time the guidance was produced and published, also received payments from GlaxoSmithKline for consultancy and lecturing until 2002.

6) Dr. Arnold Monto, University of Michegan, co-author of ‘WHO Guidelines on the Use of Vaccines and Antivirals during Influenza Pandemics 2004′ (annexe dealing with vaccine usage in pandemics), while simultaneously receiving honorariums, consultancy fees, and research support from Roche, consultancy fees and research support from GlaxoSmithKline ($3000 speakers fees in 2009) and also research funding from ViroPharma.

British Medical Journal: Original Article
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/340/jun03_4/c291

UPDATE: Under increasing pressure from recent investigations into their scandalous conduct the WHO have reluctantly released the complete ‘List of Members of, and Advisor to, the International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee concerning Influenza Pandemic (H1N1) 2009′. It further strengthens the merits of the BMJ report. Scientists on the Committee with admitted financial ties to pharmaceutical companies include:

1) Arnold Monto, a professor of epidemiology at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, has declared current and past consultancies in the field of pandemic and/or seasonal influenza for GSK, Novartis, Roche, Baxter and Sanofi. The remuneration for each of these consultancies is below US$10 000. In addition, his research unit at the University of Michigan has received a grant from Sanofi Pasteur for a clinical trial conducted in 2007-2008 on the comparative efficacy of inactivated and live attenuated influenza vaccines.

2) John Wood, a principal scientist in the virology division of the UK’s National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, has performed contract research for Sanofi Pasteur, CSL, IFPMA, Novartis and Powdermed in the field of influenza vaccine research and development.

3) Maria Zambon, who heads the respiratory virus unit in the virus reference department at the Health Protection Agency, Centre for Infection in London, receives funding from vaccine manufacturers, including Sanofi, Novartis, CSL, Baxter and GSK, for contract work in her laboratory.

4) Neil Morris Ferguson, a chair in mathematical biology in the department of infectious disease epidemiology at the Imperial College Faculty of Medicine in London, has acted as a consultant for Roche and GSK Biologicals (ceasing in 2007), with total remuneration from all such work being under US$7 000 in 2007.

5) Nancy Cox, the director of the influenza division at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, disclosed that her public health and surveillance research unit at the US Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) receives financial support from IFPMA for activities of CDC as a WHO Collaborating Centre in the field of influenza vaccine research and virus isolation work.

The WHO have issued a measured statement in conjunction with this release; deflecting attention away from the obvious conflicts of interest while back-peddling away from any further investigation into suspicious corporate alliances: “The interests summarized above do not give rise to a conflict of interest such that the experts concerned should be partially or totally excluded from participation in the Emergency Committee. However, following WHO’s policy, they were disclosed within the Committee so that other members were aware of them. All other Members of the Emergency Committee declared no relevant interests.”
http://www.who.int/ihr/emerg_comm_members_2009/en/

For years the WHO had defined pandemics as outbreaks causing “enormous numbers of deaths and illness” but in early May 2009 it removed this phrase—describing a measure of severity—from the definition.

DEFINITION OF PANDEMIC (before May 2009) – “An influenza pandemic occurs when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in several, simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness. With the increase in global transport and communications, as well as urbanization and overcrowded conditions, epidemics due the new influenza virus are likely to quickly take hold around the world.”
http://web.archive.org/web/20050207101237/http:/www.who.int/csr/disease/influenza/pandemic/en/

DEFINITION OF A PANDEMIC (after May 2009) – “A disease epidemic occurs when there are more cases of that disease than normal. A pandemic is a worldwide epidemic of a disease. An influenza pandemic may occur when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity. With the increase in global transport, as well as urbanization and overcrowded conditions in some areas, epidemics due to a new influenza virus are likely to take hold around the world, and become a pandemic faster than before. WHO has defined the phases of a pandemic to provide a global framework to aid countries in pandemic preparedness and response planning. Pandemics can be either mild or severe in the illness and death they cause, and the severity of a pandemic can change over the course of that pandemic.”
http://www.who.int/csr/disease/influenza/pandemic/en/

“A defining characteristic of a pandemic is the almost universal vulnerability of the world’s population to infection. Not all people become infected, but nearly all people are at risk.” Dr. Margaret Chan, Director-General/WHO
http://www.who.int/dg/speeches/2009/62nd_assembly_address_20090518/en/

PANDEMIC UPDATE (08/10/10) “The world is no longer in phase 6 of influenza pandemic alert. We are now moving into the post-pandemic period. The new H1N1 virus has largely run its course. Based on experience with past pandemics, we expect the H1N1 virus to take on the behaviour of a seasonal influenza virus and continue to c…irculate for some years to come.” Dr Margaret Chan/Director-General of WHO (08/10/10)
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2010/h1n1_vpc_20100810/en/index.html

“The recommendation to put the pandemic virus in the upcoming vaccine really means that this has been a dominant virus, and it is expected that it will continue to be a very significant virus circulating around the world. At this point, we have to say that the pandemic is not over,” Keiji Fukuda, MD, MPH, special adviser to the WHO
http://www.medpagetoday.com/InfectiousDisease/Vaccines/18550

SWINE FLU VIRUS TO REPLACE SEASONAL SHOT ‘Based on the analyses it is expected that A (H1N1) pandaemic 2009, A (H3N2) and B viruses will co-circulate in the northern hemisphere 2010-2011 with the likelihood that the pandemic A (H1N1) 2009 viruses will predominate. Based on recent epidemiological evidence it is anticipated that seasonal A (H1N1) viruses are not likely to circulate at significant levels during the 2010-2011 northern hemisphere season; hence it has not been recommended for inclusion in the 2010-2011 vaccine.’

Recommended viruses to be used for 2010-2011:

1) A/California/7/2009 (H1N1)-like virus

2) A/Perth/16/2009 (H3N2)-like virus

3) B/Brisbane/60/2008-like virus

http://www.who.int/csr/disease/influenza/201002_Recommendation.pdf