“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.” John F. Kennedy, in a speech given at the White House, 1962

NUREMBERG CODE: (adopted August 19, 1947)

LAW #10 – VOLUNTARY CONSENT

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.

This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.

This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

LAW #10 excerpts

2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
http://www.know-vaccines.org/nuremberg.html

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION: DECLARATION OF HELSINKI (adopted June, 1964)

#9 In any research on human beings, each potential subject must be adequately informed of the aims, methods, anticipated benefits and potential hazards of the study and the discomfort it may entail. He or she should be informed that he or she is at liberty to abstain from participation in the study and that he or she is free to withdraw visor her consent to participation at any time. The physician should then obtain the subject’s freely given informed consent, preferably inheriting.

#10 When obtaining informed consent for the research project the physician should be particularly cautious if the subject is in dependent relationship to him or her or may consent under duress. In that case the informed consent should be obtained by a physician who isn’t engaged in the investigation and who is completely independent of this official relationship.

#11 In case of legal incompetence, informed consent should be obtained from the legal guardian in accordance with national legislation. Where physical or mental incapacity makes it impossible to obtain informed consent, or when the subject is a minor, permission from the responsible relative replaces that of the subject in accordance with national legislation. Whenever the minor child is in fact able to give a consent, the minor’s consent must be obtained in addition to the consent of the minor’s legal guardian.
http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/helsinki/

EUROPEAN UNION CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS (adopted December 1, 2009)

‘Deprivation of life shall not be regarded as inflicted in contravention of this Article when it results from the use of force which is no more than absolutely necessary: in defence of any person from lawful violence; in order to effect a lawful arrest or to prevent the escape of a person lawfully detained; in action lawfully taken for the purpose of quelling a riot or insurrection.’
http://www.eucharter.org/home.php?page_id=9

THE HYPOCRATIC OATH: Modern Text used in many Medical Schools –

I swear to fulfill, to the best of my ability and judgment, this covenant:

• I will respect the hard-won scientific gains of those physicians in whose steps I walk, and gladly share such knowledge as is mine with those who are to follow.
• I will apply, for the benefit of the sick, all measures which are required, avoiding those twin traps of overtreatment and therapeutic nihilism.
• I will remember that there is art to medicine as well as science, and that warmth, sympathy, and understanding may outweigh the surgeon’s knife or the chemist’s drug.
• I will not be ashamed to say “I know not,” nor will I fail to call in my colleagues when the skills of another are needed for a patient’s recovery.
• I will respect the privacy of my patients, for their problems are not disclosed to me that the world may know. Most especially must I tread with care in matters of life and death. If it is given me to save a life, all thanks. But it may also be within my power to take a life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty. Above all, I must not play at God.
• I will remember that I do not treat a fever chart, a cancerous growth, but a sick human being, whose illness may affect the person’s family and economic stability. My responsibility includes these related problems, if I am to care adequately for the sick.
• I will prevent disease whenever I can, for prevention is preferable to cure.
• I will remember that I remain a member of society, with special obligations to all my fellow human beings, those sound of mind and body as well as the infirm.
• If I do not violate this oath, may I enjoy life and art, respected while I live and remembered with affection thereafter. May I always act so as to preserve the finest traditions of my calling and may I long experience the joy of healing those who seek my help

VACCINE EXEMPTION FORMS: UNITED STATES
http://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx
http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/cc-exem.htm

US STATES WITH RELIGIOUS & PHILOSOPHICAL (PLUS MEDICAL) EXEMPTIONS FROM SCHOOL IMMUNIZATION REQUIREMENTS
http://www.ncsl.org/Default.aspx?TabId=14376

EXAMPLE OF STATE LAW VACCINE EXEMPTIONS – CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE
http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/immunize/Documents/IMM-365D.pdf

‘Section 120365. Immunization of a person shall not be required for admission to a school or other institution listed in Section 120335 if the parent or guardian or adult who has assumed responsibility for his or her care and custody in the case of a minor, or the person seeking admission if an emancipated minor, files with the governing authority a letter or affidavit stating that the immunization is contrary to his or her beliefs. However, whenever there is good cause to believe that the person has been exposed to one of the communicable diseases listed in subdivision (a) of Section 120325, that person may be temporarily excluded from the school or institution until the local health officer is satisfied that the person is no longer at risk of developing the disease.’

Note: I’d suggest making several (multiple) copies of the official waiver form document; one supplied to each child in a water-proof plastic sealed folder. Make sure they (each child) carry it at all times when going to/coming from school. The parent & child must be WELL versed on the exemption rules entrenched in the law. The document itself should be shown/served to school officials whenever such threats are uttered. Always have a number handy for Vaccine Legal Council on your phone lists.

NEW YORK STATE RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION FROM VACCINATION STATUTE: ‘We note in passing that the clause in Sec. 2164(9) requiring that parents who seek an exemption be “bona fide members of a recognized religious organization” has been held unconstitutional, see Scherr v. Northport-East Northport Union Free School District, 672 F.Supp. 81 (E.D.N.Y.1987), and that the state has determined it will not appeal. Brief for Commissioner Ambach at 8 n. 4. As a result, pursuant to New York’s separability statute, N.Y.Pub. Health Law Sec. 5000 (McKinney 1985), the “recognized religious organization” clause is automatically excised from subsection 9, leaving a general exemption for any person whose opposition to immunization stems from a sincere religious belief.’
http://openjurist.org/851/f2d/47/mason-v-general-brown-central-school-district-j-k-m

NOTE: The primary reason the Masons lost their appeal in court was due to legal semantics. Their lawyer complicated & compromised their position by introducing references to “science” & “nature’, playing into the hands of a Kangaroo Court system. Essentially they could have maneuvered around this technical trap by remaining steadfast in a singular religious held belief, thereby avoiding entrapment by the State. ‘They contend that their commitment to living in a “natural order” is “over and above a level of scientific belief” and argue that the district court erroneously failed to recognize that their commitment to a lifestyle, based on what they perceive as a “genetic blueprint”, rises to the level of religious belief. We reject these arguments and affirm.’

The legalese grey area that needs to be clarified is ‘a sincere religious belief.’ It’s critical to use their own terminology in your statement of record. That way they can’t hold you on any form of entrapment. By elaborating (ie. detailing too much rather than providing a straightforward, minimum requirement-type description) or eluding to conscience, nature or science in reference to religious-held beliefs, you are inadvertently setting yourself up for entrapment.

IMMUNIZATION POLICY IN CANADA (UPDATED 2012): ‘Just three (Provinces in Canada) have legislated vaccination policies, applying strictly to children about to enrol in school. Ontario and New Brunswick require immunization for diphtheria, tetanus, polio, measles, mumps, and rubella immunization, while Manitoba requires a measles vaccination.

In each case, though, the legislation includes an exemption clause. Essentially, each of the three provinces allows parents to request that their child be exempted from the vaccination requirement on medical or religious grounds, or simply out of conscience. In such instances, in the event of a disease outbreak, unvaccinated children can be excluded from entering a school.

“The exclusion of nonimmunized individuals from entry during an outbreak situation is to protect the public and to contain the outbreak as quickly as possible,” Andrew Morrison, spokesperson for the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care’
http://www.cmaj.ca/content/183/16/E1165.short?rss=1

VACCINE EXEMPTION FORMS: CANADA
http://vran.org/exemptions/legal-exemption-forms/
http://www.vaclib.org/exempt/canada.htm
http://www.forms.ssb.gov.on.ca/mbs/ssb/forms/ssbforms.nsf/GetAttachDocs/014-7470-64E~1/$File/7470-64E.doc

VACCINE EXEMPTION FORMS: AUSTRALIA
http://www.medicareaustralia.gov.au/public/files/ma_conscientious_objection_form.pdf
http://www.medicareaustralia.gov.au/public/files/medical-contraindication-form.pdf

Australia Exemption Page
http://www.vaclib.org/exempt/australia.htm

UK VACCINATION DAMAGE CLAIM/GOV’T COMPENSATION FORMS:
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/DisabledPeople/FinancialSupport/OtherBenefitsAndSupport/DG_10026664

NOTE: This UK ‘DirectGov’ form only covers compensation after the fact. And there’s another catch – by agreeing to their limited terms you opt out of any formal Class Action Lawsuit proceedings against the Gov’t & Vaccine Manufacturer. In essence it’s your Gov’t’s OWN form of legal protection, not yours.

Vaccine Exemption: Standard procedure –
1) Fill out the form
2) Have it notarized ($12-15)
3) Make 3 copies
4) File 1 with your local Health Unit
5) File 1 copy with your child’s school
6) File 1 at home with important documents

NOTE: There is a potential of entrapment here. Make sure you know all the facts before submitting to their requirements. The system is designed to be slippery. “In most cases you just type a statement with the exact wording of the law – nothing more nothing less. Don’t try to explain, don’t use bible verses. You can always write out your statement using the wording of the state law and attach a copy of the law. Don’t answer questions if they ask for more information -just show them the law.”

Additionally by signing ‘For identification purposes only’ or ‘Under TDC’ on the exemption form BEFORE your signature the Government cannot legally incriminate you for signing the document.

Do NOT sign American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) or other self-incriminating Vaccine Refusal forms
http://www.vaclib.org/legal/donotsign.htm

School Exemption Letter/form: Do you need an exemption form that will inform school nurses and let them know you are making an informed choice? Here is a long one that you can edit for your school:
http://poisonevercure.150m.com/vaccines/2008-2009exemptionletter.pdf

Can employees be forced to be vaccinated?
http://www.fairmeasures.com/asklawyer/questions/ask318.html
http://www.vaclib.org/exemption.htm#fair
“California: If you were not a health care worker, the answer would certainly be NO!”
See above link for the “may be’s” for nurses or doctors.

Exemption Forms and Information: Complete list
http://www.vaclib.org/exemption.htm

Vaccine Lawyers
http://www.nvic.org/lawfirmdirectory.aspx

UNITED STATED LAW: Currently, all 50 states have school immunization laws – although there are differences in what may be required in different states. As of May 2004:

1. All 50 states allow vaccination exemptions for medical reasons

2. 48 states allow exemptions for religious reasons (Mississippi and West Virginia are the only states that do not allow exemptions for religious reasons)

3. 21 states allow exemptions for philosophical reasons (Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, California, Colorado, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington & Wisconsin)

‘All fifty states have legislation mandating specified vaccines for students. Although exemptions vary from state to state, all school immunization laws grant exemptions to children for medical reasons. Almost all states, except Mississippi and West Virginia, grant religious exemptions for people who have religious beliefs against immunizations. Twenty states allow philosophical exemptions for those who object to immunizations because of a personal, moral or other beliefs.’ NCSL

NOTE: Re. Medical exemptions – Make sure your prescribing doctor doesn’t use the word “autism” in the exemption whatsoever, otherwise they deny it. Also the school expects a new letter waver to be submitted yearly regardless of the fact that the doctor doesn’t necessarily put an expiration date on it.

‘Most (US) states offer philosophical or religious exemptions from compulsory vaccination. In some states, religious exceptions include personal religious beliefs, whereas other states require the individual to be a member of a religion whose written texts explicitly prohibit invasive medical procedures. Even in states with exemptions, there are generally only two options: be vaccinated on the schedule recommended by CDC, or else get no vaccines at all. These laws do not allow for modified vaccine schedules or selectively vaccinating for some, but not other diseases.

Vaccine laws, including exemptions, are in constant flux—and it is important to keep an eye on them. The National Vaccine Information Center keeps a current list of the bills pending in the states.

A number of state legislatures—Connecticut, Kansas, Maine, New Jersey, and New York, for example—have introduced new bills that would preserve a parent or guardian’s right to refuse immunization for their child on philosophical or religious grounds. Some bills are allowing such exemptions, but are making the requirements stricter.’
http://www.anh-usa.org/new-vaccine-legislation-in-the-states/

“No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.” National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act/1986

“The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA or Act) created a no-fault compensation program to stabilize a vaccine market adversely affected by an increase in vaccine-related tort litigation and to facilitate compensation to claimants who found pursuing legitimate vaccine-inflicted injuries too costly and difficult. The Act provides that a party alleging a vaccine-related injury may file a petition for compensation in the Court of Federal Claims, naming the Health and Human Services Secretary as the respondent; that the court must resolve the case by a specified deadline; and that the claimant can then decide whether to accept the court’s judgment or reject it and seek tort relief from the vaccine manufacturer. Awards are paid out of a fund created by an excise tax on each vaccine dose. As a quid pro quo, manufacturers enjoy significant tort-liability protections. Most importantly, the Act eliminates manufacturer liability for a vaccine’s unavoidable, adverse side effects.” US Supreme Court Justice Scalia

SUPREME COURT RULING ON INDUSTRY LIABILITY RE. CHILDHOOD VACCINES: ‘US Federal law bars lawsuits against drug makers over serious side effects from childhood vaccines. Congress set up a special vaccine court to handle such claims as a way to provide compensation to injured children without driving drug manufacturers from the vaccine market, a no-fault system that spares the drug companies the costs of defending against parents’ lawsuits.’

‘The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that a federal law bars lawsuits against drug makers over serious side effects from childhood vaccines. By a 6-2 vote Tuesday, the court ruled against the parents of a child who sued the drug maker Wyeth in Pennsylvania state court for the health problems they say their daughter, now 19, suffered from a vaccine she received in infancy. Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the court, said Congress set up a special vaccine court to handle such claims as a way to provide compensation to injured children without driving drug manufacturers from the vaccine market. The idea, he said, was to create a no-fault system that spares the drug companies the costs of defending against parents’ lawsuits. “Vaccine manufacturers fund from their sales an informal, efficient compensation program for vaccine injuries,” Scalia said. “In exchange they avoid costly tort litigation and the occasional disproportionate jury verdict.” The vaccine court has paid out more than $1.9 billion to more than 2,500 people who claimed a connection between a vaccine and serious health problems.

The drug companies worried that they would face a flood of lawsuits over the side effects of vaccines in the event of an unfavorable Supreme Court decision. They were especially concerned about claims from families of autistic children who say the vaccines, or mercury-based thimerosal that once was used to preserve them, are linked to autism. Numerous studies have addressed vaccines and autism and found no link, including with the preservative.’
http://www.masslive.com/newsflash/index.ssf/story/us-court-rules-against-parents-in-vaccine/5e37878408ea4637b39b28172f7acbf2

ANTI-VACCINE PARENTS TO BE TARGETED WITH JACKBOOT ENFORCEMENT: ‘It is wrong to allow parents to exempt their children from required immunizations based on their personal beliefs. Exemption directly exposes children (who have no personal say in the matter) to harm. Exemptions also confer risk to entire communities. The state therefore has a vested interest in minimizing the number of children exempted from vaccination.’ AAFP fellows

A Statement Regarding Personal Belief Exemption from Immunization Mandates –from– The Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society March 2011

It is recognized that in some states, failure to pass personal belief exemption legislation or regulation could result in public backlash that will erode support for immunization mandates. If legislation or regulation is being considered in this situation, it should contain the following provisions, which are intended to minimize use of exemptions as the “path of least resistance” for children who are behind on immunizations (whereby it would be easier to obtain an exemption than to catch-up the child’s immunizations):

1. The personal belief against immunization must be sincere and firmly held.

2. Before a child is granted an exemption, the parents or guardians must receive state-approved counseling that delineates the personal and public health importance of immunization, the scientific basis for safety of vaccines, and the consequences of exemption for their child as well as other children in the community who are vulnerable to disease and cannot otherwise be protected.

3. Before a child is granted an exemption, the parents or guardians must sign a statement that delineates the basis, strength, and duration of their belief; their understanding of the risks that refusal to immunize has on their child’s health and the health of others (including the potential for serious illness or death); and their acknowledgement that they are making the decision not to vaccinate on behalf of their child.

4. Parents and guardians who claim exemptions should be required to revisit the decision annually with a state-approved counselor and should be required to sign a statement each year to renew the exemption.

5. Children should be barred from school attendance and other group activities if there is an outbreak of a disease that is preventable by a vaccination from which they have been exempted. Parents and guardians who claim exemptions for their children should acknowledge in writing their understanding that this will occur.

Whether or not children should be vaccinated before childcare or school entry ought not be a matter of “belief”. Rather, it should be a matter of public policy based on the best available scientific evidence, and in this case the science is definitive: vaccines are safe and they save lives. In this context, it is wrong to allow parents to exempt their children from required immunizations based on their personal beliefs. Exemption directly exposes children (who have no personal say in the matter) to harm…Exemptions also confer risk to entire communities…The state therefore has a vested interest in minimizing the number of children exempted from vaccination, because disease will resurge if too many are exempted, and no one knows a priori exactly how many is too many.

Vaccine Advocacy Committee
Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (comprised of American Academy of Family Physicians/AAFP fellows)

AMDA Joins Call for Mandatory Flu Vaccinations for Health Care Personnel – Add one more group to the growing list of health care organizations calling for mandatory annual influenza vaccinations for health care personnel. The American Medical Directors Association, or AMDA, recently released a position statement supporting mandatory vaccination for health care personnel with direct patient contact in long-term care.

The AMDA joins the following groups with similar positions:

American Academy of Pediatrics;
American College of Physicians, or ACP;
American Public Health Association;
Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology;
Infectious Diseases Society of America;
National Foundation for Infectious Diseases;
National Patient Safety Foundation; and
Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America.

Although the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the ACP and the AAFP have recommended (5-page PDF; About PDFs) for years that all health care workers receive annual influenza immunizations, less than half of health care workers are immunized against the flu each year (4-page PDF; About PDFs), according to the CDC.

Currently, the AAFP’s Commission on Health of the Public and Science is reviewing a policy on mandatory influenza vaccinations for health care personnel.

Such policies can be difficult to enforce, however. In 2009, the New York state health commissioner announced that vaccination against the seasonal flu and novel influenza A (H1N1) would be required for all health care personnel, but the regulation was suspended amid protests from nurses and public health workers, as well as because initial supplies of H1N1 vaccine were limited.

Jamie Loehr, M.D., a former AAFP vaccine science fellow from Ithaca, N.Y., said mandatory flu vaccine is “a perfectly legitimate public health requirement.”

“We are already required to be immune to measles, mumps and rubella before working in the hospital and need annual tuberculosis testing,” he told AAFP News Now. “This requirement is merely an extension of those precedents.”

Everett Schlam, M.D., another former vaccine science fellow and assistant director of Mountainside Family Practice Associates in Verona, N.J., said his practice requires workers to wear a mask and sign a declination statement if they are not vaccinated against the flu.

http://www.pids.org/images/stories/pdf/pids-pbe-statement.pdf
http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/publications/news/news-now/health-of-the-public/20110504pidsvaccstmt.html

IMMIGRATION VACCINE POLICY FOR ENTRANCE INTO UNITED STATES: ‘Under the new criteria, vaccines against the following diseases are required: mumps, measles, rubella, tetanus, diphtheria, meningococcal disease, pneumococcal disease, haemophilus influenza type B (Hib), rotavirus, varicella, influenza, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, pertussis, and polio. Effective December 14, 2009, ACIP-recommended vaccines against human papillomavirus (HPV) and zoster are no longer required because they do not meet the CDC’s new criteria.’
http://travel.state.gov/visa/laws/telegrams/telegrams_4657.html

THIS IS FROM THE HORSE’S MOUTH. SO DON’T EVER BE CONNED INTO GETTING A SHOT FOR TRAVEL (NON-IMMIGRATION RELATED) WHEN YOU TECHNICALLY DON’T HAVE TO. PLENTY OF SAFE, EFFECTIVE FORMS OF PREVENTION IN YOUR BACKYARD ‘The only vaccine required by International Health Regulations is yellow fever vaccination for travel to certain countries in sub-Saharan Africa and tropical South America. Meningococcal vaccination is required by the government of Saudi Arabia for annual travel during the Hajj.’ CDC
http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/content/vaccinations.aspx

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION checklist for influenza pandemic preparedness planning: Section 1.5.1 Legal and ethical issues –

‘During a pandemic, it may be necessary to overrule existing legislation or (individual) human rights. Examples are the enforcement of quarantine (overruling individual freedom of movement), use of privately owned buildings for hospitals, off-license use of drugs, compulsory vaccination or implementation of emergency shifts in essential services. These decisions need a legal framework to ensure transparent assessment and justification of the measures that are being considered, and to ensure coherence with international legislation (International Health Regulations).
http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/influenza/FluCheck6web.pdf

World Health Organization Level 6 Guidelines –
Pharmaceutical measures
• Distribute antivirals, and other medical supplies in accordance with national plans.
• Implement vaccine procurement plans.
• Plan for vaccine distribution and accelerate preparations for mass vaccination campaigns.
http://www.who.int/csr/disease/influenza/extract_PIPGuidance09_phase5_6.pdf

The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act: Article V1 Section 603 – ‘During the public health emergency the public health authority may isolate or quarantine an individual or groups of individuals. This includes individuals or groups who have not been vaccinated.’
http://www.publichealthlaw.net/MSEHPA/MSEHPA2.pdf

‘The Food and Drug Administration announces it will allow some drugs and vaccines designed to counter biological, chemical, and nuclear terrorism to be approved without human testing for effectiveness. The agency says the new rule could spur development of such drugs by eliminating a major stumbling block, the ethical barriers to exposing people to deadly pathogens like smallpox virus simply to prove that a drug works. Such drugs may be approved for marketing if evidence from appropriate animal studies shows they are effective, the agency says. “We’ve been stymied for some products figuring out a way to show human efficacy, given the ethical issues,” says Dr. Janet Woodcock, director of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research at the FDA. “One of the reasons there wasn’t commercial interest was that people were not at all certain their drugs could be approved if they developed them.” Such products will still be tested for their safety in human use.’
http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/bt/bioprep/btwatch/btwatch-may.html

Swine Flu Martial Law Bill Clears In Massachusetts –
‘The Massachusetts Senate has unanimously passed a pandemic flu preparation bill that has languished in the Legislature before the recent swine flu outbreak. Any person who knowingly violates an order of the commissioner or his or her designee, or of a local public health authority or its designee, given to effectuate the purposes of this subsection shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 6 months, or by a fine of note more than one thousand dollars, or both.’
http://uncensored.co.nz/2009/05/02/swine-flu-martial-law-bill-clears-in-massachusetts/
http://www.infowars.com/swine-flu-martial-law-bill-clears-massachusetts-senate/

‘There is no pandemic potential unless mass vaccinations are carried out to weaponize the flu under the guise of protecting the population. There are reasonable grounds for believing that the mandatory vaccines will be purposely contaminated with diseases that are specifically designed to cause death.’
Jane Burgermeister Files Charges against WHO/UN for Bioterrorism, Intent to Commit Mass Murder
http://www.naturalnews.com/026503_pandemic_swine_flu_bioterrorism.html

‘We the undersigned, as Freemen & Freewomen, do not recognize the authority of The World Health Organization (WHO) to mandate general forced vaccinations. Our bodies are sovereign territory and subject to our exclusive self-determination. Any attempted violation of this trust must be construed as a breach of said basic right. We are thus holding our elected Governments accountable in this defense with an issuance of notice: a preemptive Class Action Lawsuit to be served in the event our inalienable rights to choose are forsaken.’ VRM Petition

– Excerpt from A UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF RESISTANCE TO MANDATORY VACCINATIONS

“We can do this the easy way or we can this the hard way but it’s going to have to get done.” Glenn Ivey/Prince George’s County State’s Attorney, Maryland, USA on new mandatory Vaccination Legislation imposed on Gr.5 – Gr.10 students to have Chicken Pox & Hep B Vaccines

“When we give government the power to make medical decisions for us, we, in essence, accept that the state owns our bodies.” U.S. Representative Ron Paul

“It is from numberless diverse acts of courage and belief that human history is shaped. Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance.” Robert Francis Kennedy

“If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.” Sir Winston Churchill, excerpt from The Second World War: The Gathering Storm

Related Articles:

VRM: The Autism Report http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=10185

VRM : Former Pharmaceutical Representative Gwen Olsen Exposes Systemic Industry Fraud http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=5920

VRM: Britain’s National Health Service – Criminal Syndicate Swindling Billions While Rapidly Destroying Health Care System http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=4986

VRM: UK Institutes Brand of Medical Martial Law With ‘Super-Vaccination’ Day http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=4986

VRM : The Awakening Has Begun http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=6469

VRM: Medical Martial Law In The US – Sleeping Giant Of Tyranny http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=5865

VRM : Multi-Virus Vaccine Quinvaxem Proving Deadly http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=5219

VRM: New Generation Cancer Vaccine Will Cause Infertility http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=5311

VRM: CDC-Gate Exposes A Trail of Fraud Behind Autism Studies http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=5743

VRM : Squaline – The Military Agenda Comes Home http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=1797

VRM Live – 01/28/11: Vaccine Resistance Movement founder Joel Lord discusses Synthetic Genomics, cloned cell vaccine technology & the death of natural immunity, gutter journalism & Dr. Wakefield’s imminent vindication with ‘Truth to Power’ host Paul Mabelis.
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/empradio/2011/01/28/truth-to-power-thursday

VRM Live – 11/04/10: Vaccine Resistance Movement founder Joel Lord lays out the whole vaccine process with Paul Mabelis; including heavy metal toxicity, synergy, pregnancy issues & the basic principles of natural health at risk.
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/show.aspx?userurl=empradio&year=2010&month=11&day=05&url=truth-to-power-thursday

VRM Live – 09/24/10: Vaccine Resistance Movement Founder Joel Lord & activist/radio host Jesse Calhoun lay it all out tonite. Topics include the VRM Worldwide Autism Study, Scientific/Medical dictatorship, Natural Rights & Vaccine Industry fraud exposed. Special thanks to host Paul Mabelis.
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/empradio/2010/09/24/truth-to-power-thursday

If you appreciate the efforts to bring this information forward do consider making a donation. Any amount, no matter how small will help enable me to carry on this invaluable research. See Paypal link on the VRM website (click on ‘Donate’ tab in upper right corner). Thank you all.