Stay Updated: Posts | Comments

  • 16th February 2010 - By Joel Lord

    tp-wakefield-cp-RTR29KX1See what happens to doctors with real integrity who challenge the Medical Mafia? The equivalent of a public lynching.

    Dr. Andrew Wakefield, an outspoken critic of vaccines noted for his groundbreaking 1998 study published in British Medical Journal ‘The Lancet’ linking autism to the Measles, Mumps, Rubella shot has suddenly been rebuked by the same paper.  

    The timing of this reversal is crucial as more & more parents of vaccine damaged children in Britain & around the world are organizing lawsuits against Big Pharma.

    ‘Following the judgment of the UK General Medical Council’s Fitness to Practise Panel on Jan 28, 2010, it has become clear that several elements of the 1998 paper by Wakefield are incorrect, contrary to the findings of an earlier investigation. In particular, the claims in the original paper that children were “consecutively referred” and that investigations were “approved” by the local ethics committee have been proven to be false. Therefore we fully retract this paper from the published record.’

    “I am extremely disappointed by the outcome of today’s proceedings,” Wakefield told reporters. “The allegations against me and my colleagues are both unfounded and unjust.”

    Dr. Wakefield identified the gut/brain correlation in children with Autism all of whom received the MMR vaccine at 12 – 15 months (Inflammatory Bowel Disease a major common denominator). By treating the immunological intolerance of gluten, removing it from the diet, the bowel symptoms got better but also the behavioral symptoms got better. Primary Treatment: 1) Fibre mini Salicylates (plant based anti inflammatory) 2) Gluten Casein free diet (elimination of milk, wheat, rye barley, yeast intake).

    Gluten is the protein in wheat, barley, rye, oats and their derivatives: malt, grain starches, hydrolysed vegetable/plant proteins, textured vegetable proteins, grain vinegar, grain alcohol, malt, modified food starch, caramel, maltodextrin, soy sauce, flavourings and the binders found in medication. Since the texture of gluten is elastic it also appears in many processed foods as well as in the gum substance on envelopes.

    Casein is the protein found in dairy products. It is present in small quantities in bread, processed cereals, instant soups, instant potatoes, margarine, salad dressings, sweets and mixes for cakes. Casein is also found in some medication, including the pill or stomach tablets.

    This is a very important issue. Most informed parents are now avoiding giving their child the MMR shot set, let alone any vaccines on the market. It is therefore vital for the vaccine gurus to get it on record that researchers such as Dr. Wakefield are quacks; to vilify & make scapegoats of these brave doctors who have risked their careers coming out with the truth.

    Now they will use this fake scandal to discredit anyone in court who challenges the MMR shot (or links it to Autism in any way). And it will also strengthen any counter to legal challenges by parents of children with Autism resulting from vaccines.

    Vaccines are the main cause of Autism, primarily due to the accumulative damage from the Hep B, MMR & DPT shots – multiple live viruses & heavy metal build-up. This leads to Ischemia, a singing of the neural pathways crucial for Oxygen flow to the brain from toxic overload, thus suffocating the neurons.

    Further thousands of parents have been wrongly imprisoned for ‘Shaken baby Syndrome’. Vaccine trauma was to blame.

    Dr. Andrew Wakefield is a hero of families everywhere, of we the people all of whom have somehow been touched by Autism. He is being singled out by a tyrants for speaking the truth against a vicious Medical Hegemony committed to lying & cheating in order to sustain its lucrative Industry of death.

    Nothing is more important than our health. We have to protect rebels who fight for our right to safeguard that sacred trust. The only way we will expose Big Pharma is by learning & spreading the truth. When Professionals risk their livelihood to help humanity we owe it to them to defend their honor once they are crucified for sticking their necks out.

    Because if we allow this to continue others will think twice before risking it all to save a few lives. What price liberty?

    Wakefield’s 1998 study demonstrated “anti-myelin antibodies and digestive tract pathologies in children with autism after being given the MMR vaccine.” Dr. Rebecca Carley.

    Findings: Onset of behavioural symptoms was associated, by the parents, with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination in eight of the 12 children, with measles infection in one child, and otitis media in another. All 12 children had intestinal abnormalities, ranging from lymphoid nodular hyperplasia to aphthoid ulceration. Histology showed patchy chronic inflammation in the colon in 11 children and reactive ileal lymphoid hyperplasia in seven, but no granulomas. Behavioural disorders included autism (nine), disintegrative psychosis (one), and possible postviral or vaccinal encephalitis (two).

    The refusal by gov’ts to evaluate the risks properly will make this one of the greatest scandals in medical history. There are very powerful people in positions of great authority in Britain & elsewhere who have staked their reputations and careers on the safety of MMR and they are willing to do almost anything to protect themselves.” Dr Peter Fletcher, former Science Chief/UK Dep’t of Health


    Wakefield and Wife“On Wednesday April 7th, General Medical Council (GMC) lawyers will demand that I and likely two other doctors involved in the MMR-autism case should be erased from the UK’s medical register, removing our license to practice medicine. Doctors’ regulators have found the three of us – Professor John Walker-Smith, Professor Simon Murch and me – guilty of undertaking research on children with autism without approval from an ethics committee.

    We can prove, with extensive documentary evidence, that this conclusion is false.

    Let me make it absolutely clear that, at its heart, the GMC hearing has been about the protection of MMR vaccination policy. The case has been driven by an agenda to crush dissent that in my opinion serves the government and the pharmaceutical industry — not the welfare of children. It’s important to note that there has never been a complaint against any of the doctors by any parent involved in this case — only universal parental support and gratitude.

    My colleagues, Professors Walker-Smith and Murch, are outstanding pediatricians and pediatric gastroenterologists. They have led the field of pediatric gastroenterology for decades, devoting their lives to caring for sick children. Our only “crime” in this matter has been to listen to the concerns of parents, act according to the demands of our professional training, and provide appropriate care to this neglected population of children. It is unthinkable that at the end of an unimpeachable career, Professor Walker-Smith would even consider unethical experimentation on children under his care.
    In the course of our work, we discovered and treated a new intestinal disease syndrome in children with autism, alleviating suffering in affected children around the world. This should be cause for celebration. Instead, we have been vilified in the press, and demonized by a wasteful PR campaign by the Department of Health. The aim of this negative publicity was to discredit my criticism of vaccine safety research.

    Sadly, my colleagues have suffered severe collateral damage in this effort to prevent valid scientific enquiry. They should be exonerated, and left alone with their reputations intact, in the certain knowledge that they have done only what is right.

    The loss of my own medical license is, unfortunately, the cost of doing business. Although I do not take this loss lightly, the suffering – so much of it unnecessary – that I have seen among those affected by this devastating disease makes the professional consequences for me a small price to pay by comparison.

    As long as a question mark remains over vaccine safety; as long as a safety-first vaccine policy is subordinate to profit and self-interest; as long as the benefits of vaccines are threatened by those who have compromised public confidence by denial of vaccine damage, and as long as these children need help; I will continue my work.”

    UPDATE: New independent research presented at the 2010 Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting in Vancouver, Canada confirms unequivocally the findings of Dr Andrew Wakefield’s 1998 Lancet paper of an association between autism and serious gastrointestinal disease in children.

    The new study was conducted by the Autism Speaks Autism Treatment Network and covered data from 15 treatment and research centers in the United States and Canada.  Of 1185 children aged 2 to18 years with an autistic condition 45% were reported to have GI symptoms. Abdominal pain was most common (59%) followed by constipation (51%), diarrhea (43%), other (40%), nausea (31%) and bloating (26%). Reports of GI symptoms increased with age.  Sleep problems occurred in 70% of children with than those without GI symptoms (30%).  The problems affected all children regardless of gender, ethnic background or intelligence.

    Just as the Press moves on from vilifying Dr. Wakefield a new UK study out quietly confirms his research linking Autism & Inflammatory Bowel Disease. The research identifies a characteristic chemical signature/marker (metabolic abnormalities) in their urine. “The signature that comes up is related to gut bacteria,” says Dr. Nicholson of Imperial College London.

    BREAKING  NEWS: Dr. Andrew Wakefield, Dr. John Walker-Smith & Dr. Simon Murch Facing Imminent GMC Verdict In Kangaroo Court Trial



    Assemble at 9:30am Monday 24 May outside the General Medical Council, Regent’s Place, 350 Euston Road, London NW1 3JN, UK. At 11:30 Parents are presenting a petition to the GMC’s Chief Exec & Head of Fitness to Practise, Paul Phillips from parents and doctors around the world in support of Drs Andrew Wakefield, John Walker-Smith and Simon Murch whose fitness to practice hearing concludes on 24 May.

    The prosecution is calling for Drs Wakefield and Walker-Smith to be struck from the medical register and for Dr Murch to be suspended. This is despite increasing dissent from the medical community and testimony from parents of the Lancet 12 children that these doctors acted professionally and caringly.

    No parent has ever complained to the GMC about the three doctors. Yet, based on one journalist’s complaint, the GMC brought a case against the doctors claiming that research published in The Lancet in 1998 (a case series of 12 children with autism and bowel disease) did not have appropriate ethical approval, that they used the wrong diagnoses to select children for the research and subjected children to invasive procedures not clinically needed. Without regard for academic freedom, the doctors were also blamed for having published research that undermined public health policy supporting MMR vaccine.

    The GMC based its case on the erroneous claim that the three authors of the Lancet article failed to follow the terms of the ethical approval granted by the Royal Free Hospital in 1996 (approval 172-96). Yet it is clear from the research programme described in approval 172-96 that it was written after the Lancet research was first carried out (1995-96), and that 172-96 was not the relevant approval for the Lancet case series. The GMC based its unjust case against the doctors on the wrong ethical approval. The three doctors claim that the correct ethical approval was granted in 1995 not 1996. Because of this gross injustice the doctors will most likely lose their right to practice.

    The GMC is determined to silence these doctors and ensure they never practice or research again and that they are severely punished for publishing papers that the GMC claim encouraged public criticism of vaccine policy.

    BREAKING  NEWS: Conflict Of Interest Reveals The Real Reason Behind Attacks On Dr. Wakefield – The British Medical Journal ‘The Lancet’ Is In League With Glaxo-Smythe Kline (MMR Vaccine Manufacturer In UK Guilty Of Distributing Contaminated MMR Vaccine During The 1980’s):

    elsevierSir Crispin Davis was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Reed Elsevier Group (which owns The Lancet) in September 1999. He is also: Non-executive director of GlaxoSmithKline

    MMR VACCINE TIMELINE: The measles-mumps-rubella vaccination was introduced to Britain in 1988. Its original introduction was seriously marred by adverse reaction to the Urabi mumps strain in the vaccination. It was not until 1992 that the Department of Health, downplaying the serious adverse events that had occurred using this particular strain, took two of the MMR vaccines off the market while making low-key and somewhat mumbled explanations to the public.

    NOTE: High Court Judge Sir Nigel Davis, who led the GMC panel targeting Wakefield, is brother to Sir Crispin Davis; a shocking conflict of interest which was covered up during Sir Davis’s tenure at GSK.

    COVER-UP: Following this major problem, the Department of Health and the successive governments were determined not to admit to any other problems in relation to this vaccination.

    The British government continued to vaccinate with the two Urabi strain mumps MMR brands between 1988 and 1992, when they stopped using it, even though it had been rescinded by the Canadian government and found to be unsafe. However, the adverse reactions from Urabi were related to meningitis and not inflammatory bowel disease and regressive autism.

    The whole weight of the case against Dr. Wakefield is built on discrediting his research. But now we know that Glaxo-Smythe Kline were in major damage control after their MMR vaccine , rejected by the Canadian Government for its bad track record yet approved for use by the British Health Authorities turned out to be tainted with Mumps. This resulted in an outbreak of Meningitis in the UK. They were determined to cover up the potential fallout from the scandal.

    Ultimately the government would take the blame for its negligence in allowing a toxic vaccine to be knowingly distributed. According to their official contract GSK who be immune from prosecution in the event of adverse effects resulting from the shots.

    Meanwhile Wakefield & his fellow researchers identified a major link between the Gut problems in children who had gotten the MMR shot with an upsurge in cases of Autism. This cast a huge spotlight on GSK & the British Government.

    Initially the Lancet was quick to support Dr. Wakefield’s work in 1998. However that was before their Chief Executive Officer stepped down. Enter Sir Crispin Davis who was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Reed Elsevier Group (which owns The Lancet) in September 1999.

    Co-incidentally he is also: Non-executive director of GlaxoSmithKline. As managing director he now had the power to simultaneously regulate Lancet policy & GSK strategy from behind the scenes.

    As Autism rates continue to skyrocket the Government seems increasingly determined to shut the door on the whole Vaccine-Autism argument once and for all. They will offer instead another direction; and with it enough rabbit holes to keep the Medical Industry profits pouring in for generations to come. Leaving our children the burden of shame for our not having done enough now to reverse the tide and take back our sovereignty.

    “It is time to rethink mental disorders, recognizing that these are disorders of brain circuits likely caused by developmental processes shaped by a complex interplay of genetics and experience,”

    America’s top two mental health officials Insel and Wang point to two recent studies suggesting that autism, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are hereditary in nature. And they say researchers are already seeing positive results in genetic research on fragile X syndrome, which carries important implications for understanding both autism and intellectual disability. New knowledge about the genetics behind fragile X led to quick trials of drugs which researchers say hold promise in treating the disorder.

    DavisSir Crispin Davis: Biography

    Reed Elsevier Board of directors (Publisher of The Lancet)

    Glaxo-Smythe Kline: Board of Directors

    NOTE: If anyone should be on trial here it’s Sir Crispin Davis. Another Big Pharma cover-up.

    CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AMONGST REGULATORY AGENCIES COMMONPLACE: 4 out of 12 senior managers at the Irish Medicines Board (IMB) have a pharma background, including a former CEO who worked for a pharma company immediately before and after his time with the IMB. In total, 26% of IMB senior employees have pharma connections.

    Conflicts of interest (COIs) appear to be a significant problem within the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), where not only are 28% of recent senior MHRA personnel found to have had a relationship with pharma companies, but of the agency’s 63 expert advisors, 48 have personal interests, 32 have non-personal interests, and only 15 had no interests at all. There was a similar pattern amongst the chairs of their various Working Groups, Panels and Experts Advisory Groups.

    Within the European Medicines Agency (EMEA), up-to-date declarations of interest are listed for approximately half of their ‘experts’. 73% of these COIs are considered ‘high risk’, and yet in 65% of these cases, waivers are granted. A total of 25% of the EMEA Management Board have declared pharma interests.

    BREAKING NEWS: GMC Wolfpack Attempts to Slam The Door on Anti-Vaccine Movement – Britain Officially Bans Dr. Andrew Wakefield From Practicing Medicine In The UK:

    Britain Autism DoctorGENERAL MEDICAL COUNCIL VERDICT: “The panel has determined that Dr Wakefield’s name should be erased from the medical register. Dr Wakefield’s continued lack of insight as to his misconduct serve only to satisfy the panel that suspension is not sufficient and that his actions are incompatible with his continued registration as a medical practitioner.”

    Terence Stephenson, president of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, said the false suggestion of a link between autism and the MMR vaccine had caused “untold damage” to vaccination programs.

    “We cannot stress too strongly that all children and young people should have the MMR vaccine. Overwhelming scientific evidence shows that it is safe,” he said in a statement.

    Wakefield defended his work, and said the GMC had sought to deny that the case against him was related to whether the vaccine was safe, and specifically, whether it caused autism.

    “Efforts to discredit and silence me through the GMC process have provided a screen to shield the government from exposure on the … MMR vaccine scandal,” he said in a statement.

    Wakefield said in January that the medical council’s investigation was an effort to “discredit and silence” him to “shield the government from exposure on the (measles) vaccine scandal.” Appearing from New York on NBC’s “Today Show” on Monday, Wakefield described the British decision as “a little bump on the road.” He claimed the U.S. government has been settling cases of vaccine-induced autism since 1991.

    Wakefield said the council’s ruling against him had been “made from the outset” and vowed to continue his research into the link between vaccines and autism. These parents are not going away; the children are not going to go away and I most certainly am not going away,” he said.


    GMCGeneral Medical Council: Contact Info

    Anyone living in the UK please consider flooding the GMC to voice your opinion on this ridiculous verdict.

    GMC – Inside the UK: 0161 923 6602

    GMC – Outside the UK: +44 161 923 6602

    UPDATEJANUARY 2011: New mainstream claims alleging Wakefield perpetrated “an elaborate fraud” by misrepresenting 12 patients’ medical histories for his 1998 Study, whist lining his own pockets:

    ‘A now-retracted British study that linked autism to childhood vaccines was an “elaborate fraud” that has done long-lasting damage to public health, a leading medical publication reported Wednesday.

    An investigation published by the British medical journal BMJ concludes the study’s author, Dr. Andrew Wakefield, misrepresented or altered the medical histories of all 12 of the patients whose cases formed the basis of the 1998 study — and that there was “no doubt” Wakefield was responsible.

    “It’s one thing to have a bad study, a study full of error, and for the authors then to admit that they made errors,” Fiona Godlee, BMJ’s editor-in-chief, told CNN. “But in this case, we have a very different picture of what seems to be a deliberate attempt to create an impression that there was a link by falsifying the data.”

    Many peers are speaking out in defence of Wakefield & countering the credibility of journalist Brian Deer – ‘It was not possible for Wakefield or anyone else to falsify the prior clinical records of the children because no one at the Royal Free Hospital London had them nor is it normal practice for them to have had them. So there could be no fraud over “altering” those histories.’

    Deer and BMJ fail to make clear that:

    * as is common and normal practice those records were not provided to the Royal Free Team

    * it is normal practice to take a medical history afresh – with only the referral letter from a patient’s family doctor setting out relevant prior clinical history.

    * a child’s history is taken from accounts given by the parents

    * where a history is taken from a parent it common for that parent to be unaware of what a GP may have entered [and probably more importantly, failed to enter] in prior NHS & in other child records and medical notes

    * those records and notes [which can be created over years by numerous individuals] may not be reliable – hence the need to take a clinical history afresh

    * the Royal Free diagnoses were made independently and afresh by specialists in their fields who would not rely on prior diagnoses of GPs or others – for obvious reasons

    Further, the Royal Free clinical histories were taken not by Wakefield but by the then world leading gastroenterologist Professor John Walker Smith – who was also accused and found guilty by the General Medical Council and who is appealing to the English High Court.

    Over and above all this, as no parent was called by the GMC prosecutor in the GMC hearings [bar the one who thought the evidence was given for the Defendants’ benefit], there has been no opportunity for the parents to answer Mr Deer’s allegations or to challenge what he says nor has there been any proper full examination of these cherry-picked allegations, nor any opportunity for any claims now being made to be subject to cross-examination and independent investigation.

    Additionally, one of the witnesses in the GMC proceedings against Dr Wakefield writing to the British Medical Journal confirmed the validity of the histopathology on which the paper was based and illustrated how Sunday Times journalist Brian Deer had misrepresented her evidence. Dr Susan E Davies, Consultant Histopathologist, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge stated in the British Medical Journal regarding a BMJ article by Brian Deer that:

    There is some misrepresentation…. and lack of understanding of the process in studies involving histopathology.” and that there were significant findings “While a clinical gastroenterologist might consider caecal active inflammation with incipient crypt abscess formation to be normal in children (1), this is a significant finding to be recorded by pathologists“ “Caution in assessing histopathological opinions.” BMJ Rapid Responses 30 April 2010.

    Gary Null interviews Dr. Andrew Wakefield – 01/10/11

    Dr. Andrew Wakefield interviewed by Freelance Journalist Jon Rappoport

    Dr. Andrew Wakefield In-Studio: The Links Between Childhood Vaccines and Autism 01/18/11
    Part 1:
    Part 2:
    Part 3:

    “Wakefield should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of American and British law. Perhaps if he spends the next few years behind bars, people who have suffered from the impact of his actions will see that justice is being done.” CNN gutter editorial piece

    CNN host Anderson “CIA” Cooper grills Dr. Wakefield

    Dr. Wakefield fights back & stands his ground against mainstream media onslaught (FOX & ABC NEWS)

    DR. ANDREW WAKEFIELD WAS RIGHT. BRIAN DEER IS A LIAR. THERE WAS NO FRAUD. NO HOAX. HERE’S PROOF: ‘New documents have come to light confirming our report of intestinal disease and autistic regression following MMR vaccine published in the medical journal THE LANCET in 1998, The documents prove that there was no fraud. They describe 7 of The Lancet children, and were written by Professor John Walker-Smith in December 1996, 14 months before our team’s paper was published. Professor John Walker-Smith prepared the documents as a report for a scientific meeting based upon his own assessment of the children’s disorder, supported by the study’s senior pathologist Dr. Dhillon. I was not involved in these assessments (see Level 4, Walker-Smith’s sworn testimony). I am accused of altering the findings to report disease where none existed and deceiving my colleagues in the process.

    It has also been revealed that Dr. Godlee, the responsible editor at the British Medical Journal that published the allegations, did not adequately check these facts – facts that were referred to in both my book, Callous Disregard: Autism and Vaccines – The Truth Behind a Tragedy, published by Skyhorse Publishing in May 2010, and my complaint about Brian Deer to the UK’s Press Complaints Commission.

    On December 20th 1996 a meeting was held at the Wellcome Trust in London. This meeting was an annual gathering of doctors and scientists either collaborating with or guests of my group, The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Study Group, based at the Royal Free Hospital Medical School. For the purpose of this meeting Professor Walker-Smith prepared a presentation on our initial experience of children with developmental disorder and gastrointestinal symptoms – children who were to become part of THE LANCET 1998 paper. Professor Walker-Smith did so on the basis of his own detailed review of the endoscopic and microscopic findings2 in the intestinal biopsies. The title of his presentation was:
    Entero-colitis and Disintegrative Disorder Following MMR/A Review of the First Seven Cases: His notes of the presentation3 continued: “I wish today, to present some preliminary details concerning seven children, all boys, who appear to have entero-colitis and disintegrative disorder, probably autism, following MMR. I shall now briefly present their case history [sic].”

    Professor Walker-Smith then set out, for each child, the details from the clinical history obtained by him and his medical team (of which I was not part) and the results of his own review of the tissue findings supplemented by those of Dr. Amar Dhillon, the senior pathologist involved in the investigation of this syndrome. The relevant behavioral and intestinal pathology findings were documented by him and are set out below for each of the seven children.

    Child 1. Immediate reaction to MMR with fever at 1 [corrected, illegible] Rapid deterioration in behaviour → autism
    Histology active chronic inflammation in caecum
    Treated Asacol

    Child 2. MMR at 15 months – head banging 2 weeks later.
    Hyperactive from 18 months.
    Endoscopy – aphthoid ulcer at hepatic flexure
    Caecum: lymphoid nodular hyperplasia with erythematous rim and pale swollen core.
    Histology, Ileum mild inflammation, colon moderate inflammation
    Acute and chronic inflammation.
    Treated CT3211 [a dietary treatment]

    Child 3. ? dysmorphism – chromosomes and normal development
    MMR [sic] at 5 months [sic]
    Measles [sic] at 2.5 years* – 1 month later change in behavior
    Hyperactive with food
    Colonoscopy – granular rectum, normal colon and lymphoid nodular
    Histopathology: lymphoid nodular hyperplasia.
    Increased eosinophils 5/5 mild increase in inflammatory cells (Dhillon)
    Routine normal
    [* correction: he received measles vaccine first at approximately 15 months of age and MMR at 2.5. years]

    Child 4/5. Reacted to triple vaccine 4 months – screaming and near cot death
    MMR at 15 months – behaviour changed after 1 week.
    “measles rash” week before
    Endoscopy – minor abnormalities of vascular pattern
    Histology – non-specific proctocolitis**

    Child 5/6. MMR at 14 months.
    Second day after, fever and rash, bangs head and behaviour abnormal thereafter.
    Endoscopy – Lymphoid nodular hyperplasia
    Histopathology: Marked increase in IEL’s [intraepithelial lymphocytes] in ileum with chronic inflammatory cells in reactive follicles. Increase in inflammatory cells in colon and IELs increased.

    Child 6/7. MMR – 16 months – no obvious reaction
    2 years behavioral change – 2.5 years
    Screaming attacks – / food related
    Endoscopy – Lymphoid nodular hyperplasia terminal ileum
    Histology – Prominent lymphoid follicles
    Dhillon: moderate to marked increase in IEL’s, increase in chronic inflammatory cells throughout the colon – superficial macrophages not quite granuloma

    Child 7/8. MMR 14 months
    16 months “growling voice”
    18 months – behavioural changes – autism diagnosed at 3 years
    Barium [follow through X ray] 5 cm tight stricture [proximal] to insertion of terminal ileum
    Endoscopy- prominent lymphoid follicle in ileum
    Mild proctitis with granular mucosa
    Ileum – reactive follicles
    Colon – bifid forms, increased IEL’s
    Slight increase in inflammatory cells

    So there it is. These are the considered findings of one of the world’s leading pediatric gastroenterologists with an unparalleled experience of intestinal pathology in children, and a blinded review by an expert in intestinal pathology. These details were based upon histories and investigation findings that were independent of my input. The findings were faithfully reproduced in THE LANCET paper which was written pursuant to February 1997, at least two months after the meeting at the Wellcome Trust. There was absolutely no fraud. The remainder of Brian Deer’s allegations should be reviewed in light of the above.’

    “I advocated very strongly for the use of the single vaccines, single Measles, Mumps, Rubella, which were available at the time in the UK. The vaccination uptake did not fall. MMR went down but there was a reciprocal increase in the use of… single vaccines. Measles did not come back. Then, 6 months after I made that recommendation, the Gov’t in the UK unilaterally withdrew importation license for the single vaccines; thereby depriving parents of an opportunity to vaccinate their children. THEN, vaccination rates went down, THEN measles came back. The British Gov’t is solely responsible for that happening.

    I collected, over a 9 year period of working on litigation , as many medical experts do, a sum of money which then was donated to a new initiative to build a new centre, for the Royal Free Hospital to look at children with developmental disorder & bowel disease. I made no profit whatsoever. I lost my my job, my career, my country; and that is a high price to pay, but a price I have readily paid and would pay again for these children. They are worth it.” Dr. Andrew Wakefield

    Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s rebuttal to Brian Deer’s article in the BMJ (British Medical Journal)

    ‘The panel assembled by the government and academia to judge Wakefield, ironically, dares to speak of fraud, yet their main complaint is that his findings “might endanger the ‘sacrosanct’ vaccine program,” not that his principal findings were wrong. In fact, several independent researchers found the same measles vaccine-related colitis that he described.

    A recently released charge by the BMJ editors is that Wakefield was poised to get huge profits from a product stemming from his research results. I am not here to defend Wakefield, rather, I demonstrate the double standard regularly practiced by his vocal critics.

    Virtually every paper published on drugs, such as statins, is authored by individuals having financial links to as many as three to four pharmaceutical companies each. The same is true of papers published by major journals extolling vaccine efficacy and safety. They know these papers violate every ethical principle known, yet they are published in some of the most prestigious journals.

    Abundant evidence has shown that these very same people destroy the reputations of anyone producing evidence, no matter how well researched and of the highest ethical standards, if it in any way endangers this vaccine program. It is ironic that these accusers speak of “blatant fraud,” when virtually all of the vaccine safety evidence they use abundantly is fraudulent by careful design.’ Dr. Russell Blaylock, 01/13/11

    2002 Vaccine-Autism formal hearings – Medical testimony by Dr. Arthur Krigsman, Dep’t of Pediatrics/NYU School of Medicine, reinforces Dr. Wakefield’s overall findings: “Okay. So looking at our 43 patients, what are our cumulative results? Well, the percent of patients who have colitis, 65 percent. And by colitis, I mean either active colitis or chronic colitis. There is a difference. Active colitis, 51 percent of the patients have that; chronic colitis, 40 percent. Most patients have both, which is why the overall colitis indicator is 65 percent.


    A third type of colitis is the osinofilla (ph) colitis, also described by Dr. Wakefield. We have that a seven percent number, very similar to his number. The percentage of patients who had those large nodularities of the ileum, we found to be 90 percent; also very similar to Dr. Wakefield’s. Thirty-five percent of our patients had no form of colitis. However, even though they did not have colitis or inflammation on biopsy, all of them, without exception, had abnormal lymph nodes. So they are not normal, even though there is no colitis.”

    2006 North Carolina University study further reinforces Dr. Wakefield’s findings: ‘Of the handful of results we have in so far, all are vaccine strain, none are wild measles. This research proves that in the gastrointestinal tract of a number of children who have been diagnosed with regressive autism, there is evidence of measles virus. What it means is that the study done earlier by Dr Wakefield and published in 1998 is CORRECT. If that’s the case, and this live virus is residing in the gastrointestinal tract of some children, and then they have GI inflammation and other problems, it may be related to the MMR.’

    ‘This new study confirms what we found in British children and again with Professor O’Leary. The only exposure these children have had to measles is through the MMR vaccine. ‘They were developing normally until they regressed. They now suffer autism and bowel disease. ‘The Department of Health and some of the media wanted to dismiss our research as insignificant. The excuse was that no one else had the same findings as us. What they didn’t say is that no one else had looked.’ Dr. Wakefield

    “I am a very experience medical research scientist with a child “probably” affected by MMR. To date, I’ve not read any work which actually properly addresses the issue about the hypothesized link first voiced in 1998. I am VERY disappointed in the authorities “blaming” Dr Wakefield rather than ensuring the right research is carried out.” Noted comment

    ‘Public health expert Professor Walter Spitzer, who has studied the complete medical records of 505 children, says the odds favor a link between the triple measles, mumps and rubella vaccine and the development of autism. The emeritus professor of epidemiology at McGill University, Montreal, will be supporting the parents case due to begin at the High Court in spring. His involvement is highly embarrassing for Government health officials. The professor said three factors supported a link including a very steep rise in autism which coincided with the launch of MMR practically drowning the market for single vaccines in several countries.’

    Jenny Mccarthy counters Big Pharma smear campaign: “Dr. Andrew Wakefield is being discredited to prevent an historic study from being published that for the first time looks at vaccinated versus unvaccinated primates and compares health outcomes, with potentially devastating consequences for vaccine makers and public health officials.

    It is our most sincere belief that Dr. Wakefield and parents of children with autism around the world are being subjected to a remarkable media campaign engineered by vaccine manufacturers reporting on the retraction of a paper published in The Lancet in 1998 by Dr. Wakefield and his colleagues.

    The retraction from The Lancet was a response to a ruling from England’s General Medical Council, a kangaroo court where public health officials in the pocket of vaccine makers served as judge and jury. Dr. Wakefield strenuously denies all the findings of the GMC and plans a vigorous appeal.

    Despite rampant misreporting, Dr. Wakefield’s original paper regarding 12 children with severe bowel disease and autism never rendered any judgment whatsoever on whether or not vaccines cause autism, and The Lancet’s retraction gets us no closer to understanding this complex issue.

    Dr. Wakefield is one of the world’s most respected and well-published gastroenterologists. He has published dozens of papers since 1998 in well-regarded peer-reviewed journals all over the world. His work documenting the bowel disease of children with autism and his exploration of novel ways to treat bowel disease has helped relieve the pain and suffering of thousands of children with autism.

    For the past decade, parents in our community have been clamoring for a relatively simple scientific study that could settle the debate over the possible role of vaccines in the autism epidemic once and for all: compare children who have been vaccinated with children who have never received any vaccines and see if the rate of autism is different or the same.

    Few people are aware that this extremely important work has not only begun, but that a study using an animal model has already been completed exploring this topic in great detail.

    Dr. Wakefield is the co-author, along with eight other distinguished scientists from institutions like the University of Pittsburgh, the University of Kentucky, and the University of Washington, of a set of studies that explore the topic of vaccinated versus unvaccinated neurological outcomes using monkeys.

    The first phase of this monkey study was published three months ago in the prestigious medical journal Neurotoxicology, and focused on the first two weeks of life when the vaccinated monkeys received a single vaccine for Hepatitis B, mimicking the U.S. vaccine schedule. The results, which you can read for yourself HERE, were disturbing. Vaccinated monkeys, unlike their unvaccinated peers, suffered the loss of many reflexes that are critical for survival.

    Dr. Wakefield and his scientific colleagues are on the brink of publishing their entire study, which followed the monkeys through the U.S. childhood vaccine schedule over a multi-year period. It is our understanding that the difference in outcome for the vaccinated monkeys versus the unvaccinated controls is both stark and devastating.”

    Dr. Rebecca Carley responds to attacks on Dr. Wakefield: “Re: retracted a controversial study; how can findings be “retracted”? Wakefield found measles virus in the bowel lymphoid tissue in autistic children. That is why he is being attacked, because this finding shows that the measles vaccine GAVE the children measles, which could not be eliminated due to the corruption of the immune system explained in “Inoculations the True WMD” and “Dr Carley’s Responce to the CDC” on, which occurs when viruses are injected into the bloodstream.

    Re: “British surgeon” and “Wakefield took blood samples from children at his son’s birthday party”, Wakefield is a gastroenterologist, not a surgeon. He found the measles virus in the lymphoid tissue in the guts of autistic children during endoscopies, which were obviously not performed at a birthday party.

    Re: “Subsequent studies have found no proof that the vaccine is connected to autism”, who sponsored those studies? BIG PHARMA; in fact, such conflicts of interest are the NORM in medical journals.”

    Why Medical Authorities Went to Such Extremes to Silence Dr. Andrew Wakefield

    Petition in Support of Dr. Wakefield

    Callous Disregard: Autism and Vaccines—The Truth Behind a Tragedy. Dr Andrew Wakefield Reveals the Inside Story of the Vaccine-Autism Connection

    “During the past 25 years… I’ve seen doctors who tell the truth about vaccine risks be viciously attacked by government and industry. From the moment Wakefield stood his ground, I knew he would make history but pay a terrible price for it.” Dr. F.E. Yazbak, MD, FAAP, Pediatric Infectious Disease Specialist

    “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” Joseph Goebbels


    Related Articles:

    VRM: Dr. Wakefield’s Imminent Vindication – Turning Of The Tide

    VRM Worldwide Autism Study

    VRM: The Problem With Vaccines Part 1

    VRM: The Problem With Vaccines Part 2 – Synergistic Effect of Heavy Metal Toxicity On The Body

    VRM: Vaccine Clinic – A Concise Compendium To The Problem With Vaccines

    VRM: The Problem With Vaccines Part 3 – Synthetic Genomics & The Death Of Natural Immunity

    VRM: A Concise Compendium To The Problem With Vaccines Part 3 – Synthetic Genomics & The Death Of Natural Immunity

    VRM: The Problem With Vaccines Part 4 – Primary Aspects of Vaccine Toxicity Affecting Body

    VRM: The Problem With Vaccines Part 5A – Detoxification & Restoration of the Body



    VRM: The Problem With Vaccines Part 5B – Detoxification & Restoration of the Body

    VRM: Vaccine Ingredients

    VRM: Safe Alternatives to Vaccines

    VRM: Family Charts Gradual Decline Of Daughter

    VRM: Autism – Steps To Take Toward Prevention

    VRM: Health Matters Part 1

    VRM: Health Matters Part 2

    VRM: Alternative Cancer Cures That Work

    VRM: Pregnancy Tips

    VRM: The Vanishing Sperm Count

    VRM: Media Spin & Swine Flu Hysteria

    VRM: H1N1 Vaccine Surplus From 2009 Reveals Growing Distrust of Gov’t & WHO – Cost To Taxpayers Exceeds 2.5 Billion

    VRM: Flu Death Statistics – WHO & The Big Lie

    VRM: Canada’s 2010-11 Flu Vaccine A Deadly Concoction

    VRM: United States 2010-11 Flu Vaccine Afluria – Buyer Beware

    VRM: Australian Vaccine Scandal

    VRM: Polio – United Nations & The Great Cull

    VRM : Vaccine Industry Deception, Propaganda & Media Collusion

    VRM: Birth of Medical & Scientific Dictatorship – Future Scenarios

    VRM: H1N1 Bio-weaponry Incorporated

    VRM : Aids & The WHO Connection – Criminal Intent

    VRM: Morgellons Syndrome & Chemtrails

    VRM : Council On Foreign Relations 10/16/09- Major Influence on Government Vaccine Policy

    VRM: Closed Door CDC Meeting Reveals Industry Cover-up Of Heavy Metal Toxicity In Vaccines

    VRM: The Rockefeller Foundation Drafts A Post-Pandemic Scenario

    VRM : World Health Organization & Vaccine Manufacturers Implicated In Massive H1N1 Financial Scam Involving Kickbacks & Cover-ups

    VRM : Former Pharmaceutical Representative Gwen Olsen Exposes Systemic Industry Fraud

    VRM: Britain’s National Health Service – Criminal Syndicate Swindling Billions While Rapidly Destroying Health Care System

    VRM: UK Institutes Brand of Medical Martial Law With ‘Super-Vaccination’ Day

    VRM : The Awakening Has Begun

    VRM: Medical Martial Law In The US – Sleeping Giant Of Tyranny

    VRM : Multi-Virus Vaccine Quinvaxem Proving Deadly

    VRM: New Generation Cancer Vaccine Will Cause Infertility

    VRM: CDC-Gate Exposes A Trail of Fraud Behind Autism Studies

    VRM : Squaline – The Military Agenda Comes Home

    VRM Live – 01/28/11: Vaccine Resistance Movement founder Joel Lord discusses Synthetic Genomics, cloned cell vaccine technology & the death of natural immunity, gutter journalism & Dr. Wakefield’s imminent vindication with ‘Truth to Power’ host Paul Mabelis.

    VRM Live – 11/04/10: Vaccine Resistance Movement founder Joel Lord lays out the whole vaccine process with Paul Mabelis; including heavy metal toxicity, synergy, pregnancy issues & the basic principles of natural health at risk.

    VRM Live – 09/24/10: Vaccine Resistance Movement Founder Joel Lord & activist/radio host Jesse Calhoun lay it all out tonite. Topics include the VRM Worldwide Autism Study, Scientific/Medical dictatorship, Natural Rights & Vaccine Industry fraud exposed. Special thanks to host Paul Mabelis.

    If you appreciate the efforts to bring this information forward do consider making a donation. Any amount, no matter how small will help enable me to carry on this invaluable research. See Paypal link on the VRM website (click on ‘Donate’ tab in upper right corner). Thank you all.


  • 8 Responses to “VRM: Dr. Andrew Wakefield Being Crucified By Big Pharma”