Stay Updated: Posts | Comments

  • 27th April 2011 - By Joel Lord
    “The first century or two of the new millennium will almost certainly be a golden age for eugenics. Through application of new genetic knowledge and reproductive technologies the major change will be to mankind itself. Techniques such as genetic manipulations are not yet efficient enough to be unquestionably suitable in therapeutic and eugenic application for humans. But with the pace of research it is surely only a matter of time, and a short time at that.” Professor Glayde Whitney, Department of Psychology, Florida State University, ‘Reproduction Technology for a New Eugenics
    “O brave new world that has such people in it. Let’s start at once.” Aldous Huxley
    Universal Flu Vaccine1
    Fast on the heels of Synthetic Genomics Inc (SGI), the world’s leading genomic driven technologies company‘s application of ‘”synthetic genomics” technologies, designed ‘to accelerate the production of the influenza seed strains required for vaccine manufacturing’ (allowing them the ability to harness designer cells for rapid factory production of vaccines), Vaccine Manufacturers have begun systematically streamlining their product to harness 21st Century Cloning technology, sensing a golden opportunity to capitalize on a cash bonanza; by focusing on “creating novel, highly potent recombinant vaccines produced via cell culture” utilizing “proprietary technology” – patented cloned cell lines for continuous assembly line production.

    Market demands are determined primarily by National Health Directives; which in terms of vaccine protocols operate in co-ordination with recommendations issued by the World Health Organization (WHO). The prevailing view from the WHO to its 194 signatory countries currently emphasizes the inevitability of a recurring Pandemic, that the H1N1 strain “has been a dominant virus, and it is expected that it will continue to be a very significant virus circulating around the world. At this point, we have to say that the pandemic is not over.”

    The US Dep’t of Health & Human Services recently committed $487 million, part of a joint venture totalling nearly $1 billion US in investment, to produce ‘50 million doses of cell-based seasonal trivalent flu vaccine, and up to 150 million doses of monovalent vaccine (Novatis Vaccines)‘ in preparation for a potential Pandemic. In tandem, the Canadian Federal Gov’t has announced a new 10-year pandemic flu vaccine contract with GlaxoSmithKline, valued at more than $425-million (in addition to a 3 year $33-million contract to Sanofi Pasteur Ltd & a $50-million contact to Novartis Vaccines: a total investment of over $500 million). The contract is intended to ensure a secure supply of vaccine for Canadians in the event of “a future influenza pandemic”. Other nations are following suit.

    The Vaccine Industry has unanimously endorsed SGI founder Craig T. Venter’s methodology, which ‘permits the construction of any specified DNA sequence, enabling the synthesis of genes (units of an organism’s hereditary information) or entire genomes (the entirety of an organism’s hereditary information), a process involving synthesis of ‘a 1.08 million base pair Mycoplasma mycoides genome, constructed from four bottles of chemicals that make up DNA. This synthetic genome has been “booted up” in a cell to create the first cell controlled completely by a synthetic genome.’ SGI, in fact, claims to have harnessed “the ability to routinely write the software of life“.

    Biondvax1One such corporation on the cutting edge, the Israeli based ‘Biondvax’, has entered the spotlight with the headline grabbing promise of a radical new one-size-fits-all type vaccine, a “One For All” Multimeric-001 Universal Flu Vaccine (“innovative synthetic influenza vaccine“) boasting ease of manufacturing, a recombinant (synthetic) protein, commercial-scale production possible in 6-8 weeks, enabling year-round, demand-based production, a single, universal (untested) formulation, truly universal (untested) immunity, effective against multiple influenza strains (Seasonal & Pandemic), Influenzas Type A & B, activates both arms of the immune system (humoral/antibody & cellular/T-cell), ease of manufacturing, recombinant (cloned/synthetic protein strands of DNA, RNA), commercial-scale production possible in 6-8 weeks (assembly line factory cloning), enabling year-round, demand-based production (ensuring a worldwide monopoly).

    This investigation has uncovered compelling evidence indicating serious flaws in the methodology, research & development stages behind the Universal Flu Vaccine; including a litany of cover-ups & skewed data fueling Biondvax’s propaganda machine.

    Part 1: Dissecting the Seasonal influenza Vaccine 

    Initially, let us examine the scientific literature on the inherent nature of Seasonal Influenza viruses and Flu Vaccine efficacy in general –

    The Influenza virus itself is constantly mutating from year to year. While mainstream doctors are traditionally divided, several prominent Studies have come forward in recent years challenging the Status Quo on the efficacy of the sacrosanct Flu shot & awakened an increasingly distrustful public to the ineffectiveness and inherent danger of vaccines. As The Cochrane Review has determined, “Over 200 viruses cause influenza and influenza-like illness which produce the same symptoms (fever, headache, aches and pains, cough and runny noses). Without laboratory tests, doctors cannot tell the two illnesses apart. Both last for days and rarely lead to death or serious illness. At best, vaccines might be effective against only influenza A and B, which represent about 10% of all circulating viruses. Each year, the World Health Organization recommends which viral strains should be included in vaccinations for the forthcoming season. Influenza vaccines have a modest effect in reducing influenza symptoms and working days lost. There is no evidence that they affect complications, such as pneumonia, or transmission.”

    “Children and the elderly are the two age groups that appear to have the most complications following an influenza infection. In children under the age of two, the efficacy of inactivated vaccine was similar to placebo. Very little info’ found on safety of inactivated vaccines in young children.” CR
    One pattern is recognizable in terms of determining a criteria for Seasonal Influenza – The majority of Flu deaths are attributed primarily to bacterial pneumonia triggered by the flu symptoms. The flu itself cannot kill you. Most victims of the flu are those 65 years and older. In almost every instance a compromised immune system is a key factor in those victims who succumb to the flu. The World Health Organization routinely cherry picks data corresponding to Influenza spread throughout the community, fudging statistics, misrepresenting category averages such that the figures appear higher than the evidence allows.

    National averages for seasonal flu related deaths around the world quoted every year by the WHO:

    UNITED STATES: 36,000 deaths per year
    EUROPE: 32,000 deaths per year
    CANADA: 2-7,000 deaths per year
    WORLDWIDE: 110,000 deaths per year

    Their claim that 36,000 Americans die from the seasonal flu is classic deception & fear mongering propaganda. Most of those deaths, as you can see by the breakdown chart here-in resulted from bacterial pneumonia triggered BY the Flu. And the age bracket for most victims is 65 and over. But the Flu itself is relatively innocuous by comparison, Actual flu death figures are statistically minor.

    The WHO base their Flu deaths averages not on the Influenza totals but on the combined Pneumonia & Influenza totals overcoming a serious political challenge – convincing the public of the urgency to be vaccinated when the crisis is no longer perceived to be real. Without that advantage of FEAR the entire Flu Vaccine Industry might very well collapse; given all that we have learned about the lack of efficacy & dangers inherent to the shots.


    2002 727
    2003 1,792
    2004 1,100
    2005 1,812


    2002 64,954
    2003 63,371
    2004 58,564
    2005 61,189


    2002 65,681
    2003 65,163
    2004 59,664
    2005 63,001

    The CDC/WHO converts numbers from the third set; based on yearly fluctuations they arrive at 36,000.

    It is significant that mass vaccinations for children under 5 only began in earnest in 2003 (CDC recommendations were issued as early as 2002). That year saw a 10 fold increase in flu deaths among children 1-4 years of age. (see Age Group category – Page 14) – See Trend Report on Pneumonia and Influenza

    1 Flu deaths are attributed primarily to bacterial pneumonia triggered by the flu symptoms. The flu itself cannot kill you

    2 Most victims of the flu are those 65 years and older

    3 In almost every instance a compromised immune system is a key factor in those victims who succumb to the flu

    Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis – ‘Influenza vaccines can provide moderate protection against virologically confirmed influenza, but such protection is greatly reduced or absent in some seasons. Evidence for protection in adults aged 65 years or older is lacking. LAIVs consistently show highest efficacy in young children (aged 6 months to 7 years)…No such trials met inclusion criteria for children aged 2—17 years or adults aged 65 years or older…No such trials met inclusion criteria for children aged 8—17 years.‘ Prof Michael T Osterholm PhD, Nicholas S Kelley PhD, Prof Alfred Sommer MD, Edward A Belongia MD/The Lancet Infectious Diseases

    ‘A new study in The Lancet Infectious Diseases reveals that the flu vaccine prevents lab confirmed type A or type B influenza in only 1.5 out of every 100 vaccinated adults … but the media is reporting this to mean “60 percent effective.” It is estimated that, annually, only about 2.7% of adults get type A or type B influenza in the first place. The study showed that the use of flu vaccines appear to drop this down to about 1.2%. This is a roughly 60% drop, but that ignores the fact that the vaccine has no protective health benefit for 97.5% of adults…Some (most major) clinical trials are only able to show a meaningful benefit because they focus on relative risk reduction rather than absolute risk reduction.

    The misleading nature of Relative risk-type Studies: If a study reports that a drug reduces your risk of developing breast cancer by 50%, that may sound great, but you must ask whether this is the relative risk or the absolute risk. Here is an example: In a clinical trial, one hundred (100) women (the subjects) take a new drug to see if it reduces the risk of breast cancer, and one hundred (100) women (the controls) take a placebo (dummy pill). Assume that after five years, researchers release data showing that two of the women who took the drug (the subjects) develop breast cancer and four of the women who took the placebo (the controls) develop breast cancer.

    Based on this data, which headline is correct? “New Miracle Drug Cuts Breast Cancer Risk by 50%!” vs. “New Drug Results in 2% Drop in Breast Cancer Risk!” If you said both headlines are correct, you are right. The headlines represent two different ways to express the data. The first headline expresses the relative risk reduction the two women who took the drug (subjects) and developed breast cancer equal half the number (50%) of the four women who took the placebo (controls) and developed breast cancer. The second headline expresses the absolute risk reduction 2% of the subjects (2 out of 100) who took the drug developed breast cancer and 4% of the controls (4 out of 100) who took the placebo developed breast cancer an absolute difference of 2% (4% minus 2%).’ Annie Appleseed Project

    An important feature of relative risk is that it tells you nothing about the actual risk. This can be very important for evaluating how significant a relative increase might be.‘ George Mason University

    As of July 31st, 2009 ‘all data of Influenza related deaths being announced by the WHO & CDC have been attributed to Swine Flu.’ They just stopped counting. A very convenient excuse to keep the public in the dark about the real impact this virus is having. Also they’ve blurred the line defining the criteria of symptoms; allowing for a huge catch basin that includes virtually any sign of flu like symptoms,

    ‘The symptoms of this new H1N1 flu virus in people are similar to the symptoms of seasonal flu and include fever, cough, sore throat, runny or stuffy nose, body aches, headache, chills and fatigue. A significant number of people who have been infected with this new H1N1 virus also have reported diarrhea and vomiting. The high risk groups for novel H1N1 flu are not known at this time but it’s possible that they may be the same as for seasonal influenza. People at higher risk of serious complications from seasonal flu include people age 65 years and older, children younger than 5 years old, pregnant women, people of any age with chronic medical conditions (such as asthma, diabetes, or heart disease), and people who are immuno-suppressed (e.g. taking immuno-suppressive medications, infected with HIV).’

    ¥ All subtyped influenza A viruses being reported to CDC were 2009 influenza A (H1N1) viruses.

    ¥ The majority of influenza A viruses that cannot be sub-typed as seasonal influenza viruses are 2009 A (H1N1) influenza viruses upon further testing.

    Once again the common theme in flu related deaths? A compromised immune system.

    ‘A recent study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that of the 36 children who died from H1N1 from April to August, six had no chronic health conditions. But all of them had a co-occurring bacterial infection. The most common co-occurring infection that causes flu-related deaths is staphylococcus aureus. A third of the population carries it, most in their nose or on their skin. The flu causes upper respiratory damage, which allows the staph to make its way into the lungs.’

    WHO documents reveal crucial discrepancies in the methodology behind calculating flu deaths,

    “A significant portion of patients with severe disease requiring intensive care had no predisposing conditions”

    “… hypertension, ever having smoked, and hyperlipidemia, conditions that are not considered risk factors for severe influenza outcomes.”

    “The numbers are not directly comparable as the studies categorized conditions differently…”

    • 98% of ICU cases in Canada had a comorbid condition, which in this report included hypertension, smoking, and substance abuse

    • nearly 1/3 of ICU patients in Australia and New Zealand had no predisposing conditions.

    • In Mexico, 84% of critical patients had an underlying condition, which in the report included hypertension, ever having smoked, and hyperlipidemia, conditions that are not considered risk fact.

    Another major blow to Industry credibility, several recent controlled studies out of Canada identified that ‘prior receipt of 2008–09 TIV (trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine aka regular flu shot) was associated with increased risk of medically attended pH1N1 illness during spring–summer 2009‘; that in fact ‘people vaccinated against seasonal flu are twice as likely to catch swine flu‘. This is naturally causing great confusion and controversy throughout the Medical establishment while undermining public trust. Dr. Ethan Rubinstein, head of adult infectious diseases at the University of Manitoba went so far as to suggest, “…it has certainly cost us credibility from the public because of conflicting recommendations. Until last week, there had always been much encouragement to get the seasonal flu vaccine.”

    There are other primary factors to consider in terms of Influenza vaccinations, including the mutability of viruses within the shots & the presence of animal cell substrate derived co-infections/cross-contamination, adventitious agents & neoplasms; all associated with a heightened risk of acquiring cancer.

    “Because the influenza virus genome is segmented, coinfection of a single host cell with two or more different influenza viruses can result in a reassortment (shuffling) of their genetic material. The antigenic shift can lead to a pandemic if the resulting progeny virus contains an HA protein to which humans have no preexisting immunity, if it has an efficient replication-competent set of internal genes, and if it can readily spread from human to human.” Dr. Antony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases, co-patent holder of “IImmunologic enhancement with intermittent interleukin-2 therapy” described as being central to gene therapies and the future of “geneto-pharmaceuticals”.

    Production of viral vaccines generally involves inoculation of a cell substrate with a vaccine seed and purification of bulk product from these cells after a sufficient time for replication of the virus or production of vaccine proteins. Other raw materials (e.g., tissue culture reagents, stabilizers) may be added to the product at various stages of production. Thus, adventitious agents could theoretically enter a viral vaccine through any of these ingredients.

    Close control of the vaccine manufacturing environment (by producing vaccines in sophisticated modern facilities), appropriate testing of the raw materials, and testing of both the bulk and final products can help ensure that adventitious agents have not entered the vaccine. Most vaccines are subjected to inactivation or purification steps that can reduce likelihood of contamination with adventitious agents (mutability factor/cross-contamination).’ US Centers for Disease Control

    “Many novel vaccines are produced in animal cell substrates, and emerging infectious diseases may theoretically be transmitted from animals to humans through these vaccines. The challenge of identifying potential adventitious agents in vaccines closely parallels the challenge of identifying the agents causing particular emerging infectious diseases.’ CDC

    ‘The experience in the early 1960s with SV40 contamination of poliovirus and adenovirus vaccines and the continuing questions regarding whether SV40 could be responsible for some human neoplasms (types of cancer) underscore the importance of keeping viral vaccines free of adventitious agents. This is particularly important when there is a theoretical potential for contamination of a vaccine with viruses that might be associated with neoplasia (cancer).

    However, if their growth in tissue culture is not well controlled, there may exist additional opportunities for contamination of cells with a longer lifespan. In cases of neoplastic cells for which the transforming event is unknown, there is also a theoretical possibility that transformation occurred as a result of a previous viral infection. Because some mammalian tumors and some cells transformed by viruses contain infectious virus, cells transformed by an unknown mechanism have a theoretical risk of containing transforming virus.

    Cells for which specific knowledge of the transforming event exists (and can be shown not to be a virus that persists in the cells) may be more easily characterized than cells for which there is no specific knowledge of the transforming event (which could theoretically have been due to an infection with a known or an unknown virus).

    In addition to assessing the possibility of contamination of cell substrates with infectious virus, it is important to consider other agents such as the agent of TSE (Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy). There are several mechanisms by which vaccine cell substrates, including neoplastic cells, could theoretically become infected with a TSE agent.’ US Food & Drug Administration

    Primary Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Ingredients

    1. Thimerosal Mercury The Vaccine Industry continues to promote the widespread use of Thimerosal Mercury , as a sterilant-preservative, particularly in the Influenza vaccine; despite mounting scientific evidence verifying its inherent dangers to human health. Most versions currently contain an average 25 micrograms of Thimerosal. Based on EPA standards this is considered a safe level of exposure for a 2500 pound adult. Studies reveal that the level of mercury in the umbilical cord blood of newborns is 1.7 times higher than the mercury level in their mother’s blood.

    “Ethyl Mercury: Organic mercury attached to short carbon chain, converts to inorganic mercury quicker than Methyl Mercury – in about 7 days. Once entered into the brain it becomes trapped. The timing makes the poison.  Thimerosal in vaccines: 0.01% = 50,000 micrograms/litre (50% mercury content, 250 times higher than the EPA safe limit). Amount of Hazardous waste in vaccines: 25,000 times higher than EPA safe limit (200 parts per billion = hazardous waste. Drinking water: 2.5 billion parts per billion = toxic waste).” Dr. David Ayoub

    Studies have shown that mercury is taken up in the periphery by all nerve endings and rapidly transported inside the axon of the nerves (axonal transport) to the spinal cord & brainstem. Unless actively removed, mercury has an extremely long half-life of somewhere between 15 and 30 years in the central nervous system. Hair analysis showed mercury levels to be 20,000 higher in those with cardiac abnormalities.

    Studies reveal that the level of mercury in the umbilical cord blood of newborns is 1.7 times higher than the mercury level in their mother’s blood.

    “The search for the association between mercury and cardiovascular disease reveals 358 scientific papers exemplifying the relationship; between mercury & cancer we find 643 scientific papers. The association of mercury with neurodegenerative diseases is the most significant, with the references numbering 1,445.

    It has been shown that mercury rapidly depletes the immune system. Mercury has also been shown to induce auto-immune diseases. Anything that depletes and disturbs the immune system will increase one’s chances of contracting cancer. Mercury binds with hemoglobin, which is responsible for oxygen transport to the tissues. This results in less oxygen reaching the tissues when the body is polluted with mercury. We don’t have to look far in understanding how a heavy metal like mercury can eventually lead one to cancer’s door.” Dr. Rashid Buttar/Center for Advanced Medicine & Clinical Research

    “Injecting mercury into pregnant women and children is absurd. Examine studies which suggest otherwise, and you will find the funding for the study came from those who directly or indirectly profit from, or fear liability from, the use of mercury-containing vaccines.”

    GlaxoSmithKline quietly re-introduces Thimerosal into UK Flu Vaccine ‘Pandemrix’: ‘Up to a million under-fives have been inoculated against the flu virus with a controversial vaccine containing poisonous mercury. Pandemrix has been given to almost a quarter of all healthy babies and young children as well as thousands of older children with health problems. Inquiries by the Sunday Express reveal it contains a preservative made with a form of mercury that was phased out of childhood vaccines in 2004 after fears about its safety.’

    “Thimerosal plays an important role in preventing bacterial contamination. Regulators across the world have concluded there is no evidence the level of thimerosal in vaccines poses a health risk.” GlaxoSmithKline

    “Extensive studies have failed to find any evidence that these low levels of Thimerosal carry any risk of neurotoxicity.” UK Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency

    2. Aluminum (Aluminum Hydroxide/Potassium Sulfate) use in vaccines traces back to the early 1920’s. Alum (Sodium Potassium Sulfate) had already been used in Industrial applications for generations , mainly as a fix-it in dyes. In new trials they discovered it would also generate a prolonged immune response when injected into the body as an adjuvant; whereupon aluminum was immediately introduced on the vaccine market. However no studies were done to ascertain its effects on the nervous system or behavior. The Regulatory Agencies quietly rubber stamped & fast tracked the product for approval, merely ‘grandfathering’ it into widespread use, without any precautionary clinical safety analysis. To this day, aside from Squaline (shark oil), aluminum remains the primary immune stimulating component in all ‘heat-treated virus’ type vaccines.

    In a closed door meeting conducted by the CDC in 2000, doctors alluded to their concerns over heavy metal toxicity in vaccines; while acknowledging a glaring void in scientific research on this neglected aspect of synergy,

    “Aluminum & mercury are often simultaneously administered to infants, both at the same site & at different sites. However, there is absolutely no data, including animal data, about the potential for SYNERGY, additively or antagonism, all of which can occur in binary metal mixtures that relate and allow us to draw any conclusions from the simultaneous exposure to these two salts in vaccines.” Dr. JohnstonIn the same breath Johnson also stressed the necessity of using aluminum as an adjuvant (immune stimulant) in vaccines,

    “Aluminum salts are important in the formulating process of vaccines, both in antigen stabilization and absorption of endotoxin.”

    “But from all of the other studies of toxic substances, the earlier you work with the central nervous system, the more likely you are to run into a sensitive period for one of these effects, so that moving from one month or one day of birth to six months of birth changes enormously the potential for toxicity. There are just a host of neurodevelopmental data that would suggest that we’ve got a serious problem. The earlier we go, the more serious the problem.” Dr. Weil

    In 1927, Dr. Victor Vaughn, a toxicologist with the University of Michigan, testified before the Federal Trade Commission that “all salts of aluminum are poisonous when injected subcutaneously or intravenously”. According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, “Aluminum is now being implicated as interfering with a variety of cellular & metabolic processes in the nervous system and in other tissues. In 1997 The New England Journal of Medicine published data showing that premature babies injected with aluminum build up toxic levels in the blood, bones and brain, and that aluminum toxicity can lead to neurological damage, including mental handicaps at 18 months of age.” Neil Miller

    Aluminum is a highly conductive ‘electropositive’ metal. The human body is also charged with electromagnetic, bio-conductive energy. Essentially we are bio-electric beings. Certain storehouses are concentrated with higher degrees of “conductivity”; in particular the brain which consists primarily of neurons.

    ‘Under a microscope a neuron looks like an octopus with many tentacles. A neuron can transmit an electrical impulse to the next neuron. The network of electrical impulses enables us to receive information from the physical world and then send it to our brains, and vice versa. Without the neuron circuits our bodies would completely shut down, like turning off the power supply to a city. If it were possible to describe the nervous system as a circuit diagram, with each neuron represented by a single pinhead, such a circuit diagram would require an area of several square kilometres it would be several hundred times more complex than the entire global telephone network.’

    As Dr. Gary Tunsky illustrates, Aluminum is a coagulant which inherently binds to any toxin in its path. In fact its primarily industrial use is to bond debris in water treatment centers; whereupon it is then scraped out of the cylinders during the filtration process.

    “Your blood has no method of excretion; Heavy metals & live viruses, formaldehyde are redistributed by the blood to areas of fatty tissue (highly conductive/electrical tissues) – found in the gray matter of the brain, the Myelin Sheath, neurons, the meninges/spine, cardiac cells, breasts & ovaries (in women), prostate (in men). Blood is made of water. When you stick aluminum in your blood, anything that’s toxic debris is going to bond to and coagulate and cause a congestive coccidiosis and this stuff gets caught in the tiny highways & byways. So you have the big gushing arteries & veins but they byfricate and branch into streams like a river; and they branch in again to the tiny arterial & capillary bits. That’s where the blockages are occurring, the brain, the spine, (the intestines/bowel) fingers & toes – which turn blue, choking of the micro-vessels from all the sludge that gets caught from all these repetitive hits/vaccinations, over & over. There are 60,000 miles of blood-vessels in one body.They run through every part of your muscle, your bone, your brain. Anywhere you stick an inter-muscular injection it goes into the blood. ” Dr. Gary Tunsky

    The viscosity of this toxic sludge resulting from vaccines which accumulates in the organs (ie. heart, liver, kidney), joints, meninges, intestines, along the neural pathways, veins & capillaries interlacing the entire body (resulting from “stagnant” blood), is comparable to the black paste-like build-up found over time in the lining of your drains – especially in terms of its impact on your vital health.

    Currently children are getting 17 shots containing aluminum, a quadrupling of the amount given since the 1970’s. It is found in Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis), MMR, Hib, Pneumococcal & Gardasil (HPV) vaccines.

    Based on Dr. David Ayoub’s findings children, on average, receive 2-400 micrograms per vaccine, over a milligram of Aluminum; a concentration & dosage that is 10 – 20 times more toxic than Mercury. Multiple vaccines are far worse, over a 1000 micrograms on average for a triple set shot.

    Compounding the problem even more aluminum gets in during the manufacturing process. An indicator that the tools and/or machinery used are not properly monitored for safety.

    Acute exposure to heavy metals can lead to a host of auto-immune disorders: Downs Syndrome, Autism, Schizophrenia, ALS, Lupus, Parkinson’s & Alzheimer’s Disease, cognitive disfunction.

    ‘Research indicates that patients with impaired kidney function, including premature neonates, who receive injections of Aluminum greater than 4 to 5 micrograms (mcg) per kilogram of body weight per day, accumulate aluminum at levels associated with central nervous system and bone toxicity. This means that for a 6 pound baby, 11-14 mcg would be toxic. The Hepatitis B vaccine given at birth contains 250 mcg of aluminum – 20 times higher than safety levels allow. Babies weigh about 12 pounds (5.5 kg) at 2 months of age when they receive 1225 mcg of aluminum from their vaccines – 50 times higher than safety levels.’ Food & Drug Administration Report

    ‘The results for aluminum were almost identical to ethyl mercury (Thimerosal) because the amount of aluminum in vaccines goes almost exactly with the mercury.’ Dr. Tom Verstraeten/Epidemiologist,%20Free%20ebook.pdf

    Compounding the problem even more aluminum gets in during the manufacturing process; a clear indication that the tools and/or machinery used are not properly/thoroughly monitored for safety.

    Note: While Aluminum has been effectively removed from the current roster of Influenza vaccines, it has been used periodically as an Influenza vaccine adjuvant (ie. alternate Pandemic vaccines) and is still on the radar for further service; therefore it has been included here-in for analysis purposes.

    3. Neomycin & Polymixin B antibiotics added to the Influenza vaccine, both hazardous to a fetus. They carry serious side effects, predominantly kidney failure. Neomycin is in the FDA pregnancy category D. This means that it is known to be harmful to an unborn baby. ‘There is evidence to indicate that exposure to Neomycin during pregnancy may have a teratogenic effect on the fetus. A teratogen is a substance that can cause birth defects.’

    4. Polysorbate 80 or ‘Tween 80‘ – type of detergent stabilizer commonly found in vaccines; which is linked to infertility & severe allergic reactions (ie. Anaphylaxis). ‘Neonatal female rats were injected with Tween 80 after birth. Treatment accelerated maturation, prolonged the oestrus cycle & induced persistent vaginal oestrus. Ovaries were without corpora lutea & had degenerative follicies.‘ Based on this verifiable clinical data no such toxin should ever, under any circumstances, be injected into a pregnant woman. Despite such conclusive evidence of its implications on female fertility,

    Polysorbate 80 is, in fact, added to many current vaccines including: HPV (Gardasil/Cervavix), DTaP (Infanrix, Tripedia), DTaP-IPV (Kinrix), DTaP/Hib (TriHIBit), DTaP-HepB-IPV (Pediarix), DtaP-IPV/Hib (Pentacel), Hep A (Havrix). 2009’s H1N1 ‘Swine Flu’ vaccine (produced by GlaxoSmithKline (Pandemrix/Arepanrix), Novartis (Focetria) & Baxter Pharmaceuticals (Celvapan), widely promoted as a mandatory safety precaution for ALL pregnant women, contained this ingredient; yet another glaring red flag to be considered. Delayed effects of neonatal exposure to Tween 80 on female reproductive organs in rats.”

    “Polysorbate 80 was identified as the causative agent for the anaphylactoid reaction of nonimmunologic origin in the patient. Polysorbate 80 is a ubiquitously used solubilizing agent that can cause severe nonimmunologic anaphylactoid reactions.” Department of Dermatology, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany

    Specific role of polysorbate 80 coating on the targeting of nanoparticles to the brain (causes a blood/brain barrier breach) “Partial coverage was enough for Tween-80 coating to play a specific role in brain targeting of nanoparticles; concerned with the interaction between T-80 coating and brain micro-vessel endothelial cells. Therefore, the specific role of T-80 coating on nanoparticles in brain targeting was confirmed.” Department of Material Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China Study, 2003

    5. Βeta-Propiolactone disinfectant commonly found in the influenza vaccine..Ranked as one of the most hazardous compounds (worst 10%) to humans and “reasonably expected to be a human carcinogen” (International Agency for Research on Cancer – IARC, 1999). “Neurological complications due to beta-propiolactone (BPL)-inactivated antirabies vaccination. Clinical, electrophysiological and therapeutic aspects.”

    6. Formaldehyde – used as “a preservative & disinfectant”, binds to the proteins in your DNA, known to cause cancer, chronic bronchitis, eye irritation when exposed to the body’s immune system. “It weakens the immune system, causes neurological system damage, genetic damage, metabolic acidosis, circulatory shock, respiratory insufficiency and acute renal failure, as well as being a sensitizer which means it can make you sensitive to many other things, it is corrosive if ingested, and it is a suspected carcinogen.”

    7. Potassium Chloride – Used as part of a phosphate buffered saline in the shot. The majority of the potassium chloride produced is used for making fertilizer, since the growth of many plants is limited by their potassium intake. As a chemical feedstock it is used for the manufacture of potassium hydroxide and potassium metal; and as a flux for the gas welding of aluminium. Hyperkalemia. May induce Cardiac arrest (especially in renal impairment or if administered too rapidly). May cause pain and thrombophlebitis if administered in high concentration into small veins in patients with cardiac disease, renal impairment, or acidosis:  monitoring of acid-base balance, potassium levels, and ECG is recommended. Potassium chloride is also used as the third of a three-drug combination in lethal injection. Additionally, KCl (AN aqueous solution form of Potassium Chloride) is used, albeit rarely, in fetal intracardiac injections in second- and third-trimester induced abortions.

    8. Sodium Phosphate Dibasic Heptahydrate & Potassium Phosphate Monobasic Both excipients (pharmacologically inactive substances, carriers for the active ingredients of a medication)) used as part of a phosphate buffered saline in the shot. May sequester calcium and cause calcium phosphate deposits in kidneys. Chronic ingestion or inhalation may induce systemic phosphorous poisoning. Liver damage, kidney damage, jaw/tooth abnormalities, blood disorders & cardiovascular effects can result. Phosphates are slowly and incompletely absorbed when ingested, and seldom result in systemic effects. Such effects, however, have occurred. Symptoms may include vomiting, lethargy, diarrhea, blood chemistry effects, heart disturbances, nausea, vomiting, stomach/abdominal pain or bloating, dizziness, or headache and central nervous system effects. The toxicity of phosphates is because of their ability to sequester calcium.

    Note 1: Sodium Phosphate Dibasic Heptahydrate (also know as Disodium Hydrogen Phosphate) – Chemical composition includes Fluoride/50 mg/kg, Arsenic/50 mg/kg, Lead/10 ppm

    Note 2: ‘Monopotassium phosphate is a soluble salt used as an additive in cigarettes, fertilizer and as a fungicide and buffering agent in vaccines.  The synthesized, active, end-use product is a crystalline powder containing 100% active ingredient.

    9. Sodium Deoxycholate detergent added to new generation of ‘Split Vaccines’ to modify the whole virus which causes cell death and symptoms such as burning, redness, and swelling. It has been shown to weaken the blood-brain-barrier (BBB) and subsequently activate seizures.  It demonstrates synergistic toxicity — notably with Amphotericin B, the antifungal listed above. Recommended for stripping endotoxin (Lipopolysaccharide or LPS) from immobilized Polymyxin B columns; for use with the the Thermo Scientific Detoxi-Gel Endotoxin Removing Gel. The effectiveness of a detergent in any application is dependent on the detergents concentration. Too much or too little detergent can often have a deleterious effect.

    Extensive list of vaccine product ingredients –

    See VRM: Vaccine Ingredients

    The trivalent influenza vaccine contains 3 sets of either ‘killed’ or ‘heat-treated’ DNA/RNA strands (attenuated/muted/heat-treated version of the original virus), ostensibly a safe variant blueprint of the live virus itself which induces a robust immune response, thereby immunizing the body against the likelihood of succumbing to the flu without directly infecting the host. This is represents a fundamental flaw in scientific reasoning, verified by the legacy of ineffectiveness & co-infection/cross-contamination associated with the majority of vaccine uptake.

    Adjuvants are designed to jump-start or supercharge the immune system – to induce a robust immune response; thus immunizing the body against the likelihood of succumbing to the flu while avoiding the direct spread of infection. In truth no virus is fully killed during the vaccine manufacturing process. Typically the vaccinee is left more susceptible to catching the seasonal flu (twice a likely to catch swine flu). Depending on the degree of compromised immune system &/or pre-existing medical condition involved, a vaccine induced Cytokine Storm can rapidly trigger complete auto-immune failure throughout the individual’s body.

    ‘A cytokine storm is the systemic expression of a healthy and vigorous immune system resulting in the release of more than 150 inflammatory mediators (cytokines, oxygen free radicals, and coagulation factors). Both pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, InterLeukin-1 & InterLeukin-6) and anti-inflammatory cytokines (such as interleukin 10, and interleukin 1 receptor antagonist) are elevated in the serum, and the fierce and often lethal interplay of these cytokines is referred to as a “Cytokine Storm”.

    The primary contributors to the cytokine storm are TNF-a (Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha) and IL-6 (Interleukin-6). The cytokine storm is an inappropriate (exaggerated) immune response that is caused by rapidly proliferating and highly activated T-cells or natural killer (NK) cells. These cells are themselves activated by infected macrophages. The cytokine storm must be treated and suppressed or lethality can result.’

    The flu virus causes immune cells to produce cytokine molecules that increase inflammation. Normally this is controlled, but in extreme cases, a “cytokine storm” occurs. This can cause tissue and organ damage, and even death. When you’re fighting the flu, you feel bad not because of the virus but rather because of the “cytokine storm.” But get this: All vaccines trigger their own cytokine storms. And researchers now know that increased inflammation is at the heart of most illness and disease. Which means the vaccines themselves are hazardous to your health. The solution is to avoid flu shots, and if you’ve had them in the past, to take nutrients that will strengthen your immune system and reduce inflammatory cytokine activity.’ Dr. Russell Blaylock

    Manifestations of a vaccine triggered Cytokine Storm can range from high fever & extreme vomiting to Bronchitis, Hemorrhagic fever (drowning of lungs with fluid), Anaphylaxis (severe allergic reaction), Guillain–Barré syndrome (form of paralysis), Encephalitis (brain inflammation), acute respiratory distress syndrome, Sepsis, Bacterial Pneumonia, febrile convulsions, Sub-Clinical Epileptic Seizures, Grand Mal Epileptic Seizures, Narcolepsy, organ failure, blindness, coma & death.

    Note: an overabundance of T-Cells, Microphages & oxygen free radicals flood the body – attacking the lungs, kidneys, liver, brain, impeding Endocrine, Lymphatic, Immune & Nervous system function.

    Babies as young as 6 months old are now routinely being inoculated for influenza at 6 months; a drastic intervention in early development; by the Medical purveyors’ own admittance, one intended to boost general rates for vaccine uptake. The strategy seems to be in provoking a wider swath of vaccine uptake, thus inevitably opening the floodgates to a greater exposure of the herd.

    “We hope that the new recommendations promulgated by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) will help. Rather than focus on “high-risk groups,” as has been done in the past, the ACIP now recommends annual influenza vaccination for everyone 6 months of age or older.”

    ‘Influenza vaccine (seasonal). (Minimum age: 6 months for trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine [TIV]; 2 years for live, attenuated influenza vaccine [LAIV]) • Administer annually to children aged 6 months through 18 years.’ CDC Standard Immunization Schedule age 0-6 yrs

    The mother’s placenta, & breast milk (Colostrum) are inextricably linked, providing a baby’s primary initial source of nourishment through the long journey of formation in utero; while supplying the basic building blocks of life necessary to guarantee a safe transition into early childhood development. Mother & baby share the same Immune system while the baby is ‘in Utero’. It seems almost inconceivable given the scientific literature in circulation, but somehow the CDC, WHO & local health authorities in countries around the world have begun recommending all pregnant women & babies as young as 6 months receive Influenza vaccine during first trimester.

    The Flu Shot is Safe for Pregnant Women – Flu shots are a safe way to protect the mother and her unborn child from serious illness and complications of flu. The flu shot has been given to millions of pregnant women over many years. Flu shots have not been shown to cause harm to pregnant women or their babies. It is very important for pregnant women to get the flu shot.’ CDC

    ‘A shocking report from the National Coalition of Organized Women (NCOW) presented data from two different sources demonstrating that the 2009/10 H1N1 vaccines contributed to an estimated 1,588 miscarriages and stillbirths – as high as 3,587 cases. Studies conducted by the CDC have been shown to miss from 10% to 90% of the actual cases because of under-reporting.’

    ‘Studies of the organs and tissues of the first generation progeny revealed mercury in the stomach and intestine at birth and in the first week of life, apparently on account of the entry of mercury through the placental barrier and by way of their mother’s milk. Subsequently, it was noted that the first-generation progeny of mothers that had been previously exposed to the ethyl mercury compound had significantly reduced fertility in comparison to controls. The second generation progeny had low viability, lagged in their weight growth, and were retarded with respect to ossification in several cases. Finally, it was then observed when mating the second generation progeny that there was a significant decrease in fertility in comparison to the control group.’

    ‘70% of pregnant women in UK refusing Influenza shot: ‘Almost three-quarters of Britain’s pregnant women have still not received the flu jab this winter, according to Andrew Lansley, the health secretary. In a letter to his Labour shadow, John Healey, Lansley said that although the number of expectant mothers who have received the seasonal flu injection had almost doubled this year, more than 70% remain unvaccinated.’

    Vaccine Manufacturers & National Health Departments have begun universally emphasizing the need for alternative methods of product development; transitioning to more radical cloned cell-based technology (’laboratory-grown cell lines that are capable of hosting a growing virus’) – already in Phase 3 Clinical Stages pre-production. Reasons sighted include the Flu vaccine itself which incurs the most demand year to year. Egg based vaccine production is deemed inefficient, both “time-consuming and resource-constrained”, not only below “capacity” but readily “perishable”.

    ‘In order to produce 300 million doses of vaccine, egg-based production would require some 900 million eggs. In the case of an avian flu pandemic, egg-producing flocks could decline, jeopardizing vaccine production capabilities.While eggs are perishable, cell lines can be safely kept frozen indefinitely, increasing the capability to rapidly produce vaccines if an influenza pandemic were to occur. Vaccine manufacturers are able to bypass the steps needed to adapt the virus strains to grow in eggs. People allergic to eggs cannot receive vaccines produced from chicken eggs, but can be immunized with a cell-based vaccine.

    The new approach would use mammalian cells (kidney cells are often used) to grow the influenza viruses. Cell-based vaccine production could more easily meet “surge capacity needs” because cells could be frozen and stored in advance of an epidemic or developed rapidly in response to an epidemic. Cell-based vaccine production dramatically reduces the possibility for contamination and promises to be more reliable, flexible, and expandable than egg-based methods. In place of eggs, cell-based vaccine production utilizes laboratory-grown cell lines that are capable of hosting a growing virus. The virus is injected into the cells where it multiplies. The cells’ outer walls are removed, harvested, purified, and inactivated.’

    Vaccine Cell Substrates are taken from Animal Primary & Diploid cells or via continuous cell lines –

    1. Primary cells are obtained directly from the tissues of healthy animals. Primary cells are more likely to contain adventitious agents than banked, well-characterized cells. This concern with primary cells is mitigated by rigorous qualification of source animals and primary cell substrates. Animals from which primary cultures are established should be from specific-pathogen-free (SPF) closed flocks, herds, or colonies, when feasible. The term “closed” refers to the maintenance of a group (flock, herd, and colony) free from introduction of new animals (new genetic material). Animals that are not from closed flocks, herds, or colonies should be quarantined and thoroughly evaluated for a period sufficient to detect signs of disease or infection before introducing them into the flock, herd, or colony.

    Note: ‘Primary cells are more likely to contain adventitious agents…’.

    2. Diploid cell strains (derived from aborted fetal tissue) are established from primary cell cultures by expansion and cell banking. These types of cells have a finite life span and are not immortal like cell lines. Diploid cells usually retain a diploid or near diploid karyotype, a characteristic that also differs from cell lines, which are generally aneuploid or non-diploid.

    Note: ”Human Diploid Cells are associated with an increased risk of a theoretical ‘oncogenic agent’ (an agent that causes neoplasms/cancer)’.

    3. Some continuous cell lines, including Vero cells (derived from African Green Monkey kidneys – patent owned by ‘Dyncorp’) and CHO cells (derived from Chinese hamster ovaries), have been used as substrates for licensed biologicals. Cell lines might have biochemical, biological, and genetic characteristics that differ from primary or diploid cells (e.g., they are typically aneuploid and have accumulated genetic changes). Because the mechanism by which most cell lines become immortal is generally unknown, and because some cell lines form tumors when inoculated into immunodeficient rodents, there are additional concerns for continuous cell lines compared with diploid cells, including the potential that transformation was caused by an adventitious agent and potential risks from residual DNA.

    Note: ‘…there are additional concerns for continuous cell lines compared with diploid cells, including the potential that transformation was caused by an adventitious agent and potential risks from residual DNA’ Characterization & Qualification of Cell Substrates & Other Biological Materials Used in Production of Viral Vaccines for Infectious Disease Indications, FDA

    ‘Many live attenuated vaccines for animals are manufactured by using cell lines from animals, which are known to produce infectious ‘endogenous retroviruses(Remnants of ancestral exogenous retroviral infections fixed in the germline DNA); however, the risks of infection by ERVs from xenospecies through vaccination have been ignored.’ Laboratory of Signal Transduction, Department of Cell Biology, Institute for Virus Research, Kyoto University

    ‘It is unclear whether neoplastic cells have a greater or lower adventitious agent risk than other types of cells. Because they can be grown for long periods in tissue culture, there may be greater opportunities for any adventitious agents to be detected. Because neoplastic cells survive indefinitely, it is easier to qualify and bank cells that have passed all tests, especially as compared with primary cells (which are derived repeatedly from live tissue and must be re-qualified with each use). Moreover, many neoplastic cells can be grown in serum-free medium, potentially reducing the likelihood of contamination with bovine adventitious agents.

    However, if their growth in tissue culture is not well controlled, there may exist additional opportunities for contamination of cells with a longer lifespan. In cases of neoplastic cells for which the transforming event is unknown, there is also a theoretical possibility that transformation occurred as a result of a previous viral infection. Because some mammalian tumors and some cells transformed by viruses contain infectious virus, cells transformed by an unknown mechanism have a theoretical risk of containing transforming virus.

    Cells for which specific knowledge of the transforming event exists (and can be shown not to be a virus that persists in the cells) may be more easily characterized than cells for which there is no specific knowledge of the transforming event (which could theoretically have been due to an infection with a known or an unknown virus).

    In addition to assessing the possibility of contamination of cell substrates with infectious virus, it is important to consider other agents such as the agent of TSE (Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy). There are several mechanisms by which vaccine cell substrates, including neoplastic cells, could theoretically become infected with a TSE agent.’ US Food & Drug Administration

    VRM: “One For All” Universal Flu Vaccine – 21st Century Genetic Roulette continued in Part 2: Dissecting the Universal Flu Vaccine

    Also see VRM: The Flu Report

    Related articles:

    VRM Worldwide Autism Study
    Direct link to study:

    VRM: The Problem With Vaccines Part 1

    VRM: The Problem With Vaccines Part 2 – Synergistic Effect of Heavy Metal Toxicity On The Body

    VRM: Vaccine Clinic – A Concise Compendium To The Problem With Vaccines

    VRM: The Problem With Vaccines Part 3 – Synthetic Genomics & The Death Of Natural Immunity

    VRM: A Concise Compendium To The Problem With Vaccines Part 3 – Synthetic Genomics & The Death Of Natural Immunity

    VRM: The Problem With Vaccines Part 4 – Primary Aspects of Vaccine Toxicity Affecting Body

    VRM: The Problem With Vaccines Part 5A – Detoxification & Restoration of the Body

    VRM: The Problem With Vaccines Part 5B – Detoxification & Restoration of the Body

    VRM: Medical Industry Studies Prove Influenza Vaccine Is Both Dangerous & Ineffective

    VRM: Gardasil/Cervarix – A Legacy Of Shame

    VRM: Gardasil/Cervarix Part 2 – Demyelination, Multiple Sclerosis & the Copaxone Connection

    VRM: Vaccine Ingredients

    VRM: Safe Alternatives to Vaccines

    VRM: Family Charts Gradual Decline Of Daughter

    VRM: Autism – Steps To Take Toward Prevention

    VRM: Health Matters Part 1

    VRM: Health Matters Part 2

    VRM: Alternative Cancer Cures That Work

    VRM: Pregnancy Tips

    VRM: H1N1 Shot Reactions – Miscarriages

    VRM: The Vanishing Sperm Count

    VRM: H1N1 Vaccine Surplus From 2009 Reveals Growing Distrust of Gov’t & WHO

    VRM: Flu Death Statistics – WHO & The Big Lie

    VRM: Vaccine Industry Deception, Propaganda & Media Collusion

    VRM: Birth of Medical & Scientific Dictatorship – Future Scenarios

    VRM: H1N1 Bio-weaponry Incorporated

    VRM: Aids & The WHO Connection – Criminal Intent

    VRM: Morgellons Syndrome & Chemtrails

    VRM: Council On Foreign Relations 10/16/09- Major Influence on Government Vaccine Policy

    VRM: Closed Door CDC Meeting Reveals Industry Cover-up Of Heavy Metal Toxicity In Vaccines

    VRM: The Rockefeller Foundation Drafts A Post-Pandemic Scenario

    VRM: World Health Organization & Vaccine Manufacturers Implicated In Massive H1N1 Financial Scam Involving Kickbacks & Cover-ups

    VRM Live – 01/28/11: Vaccine Resistance Movement founder Joel Lord discusses Synthetic Genomics, cloned cell vaccine technology & the death of natural immunity, gutter journalism & Dr. Wakefield’s imminent vindication with ‘Truth to Power’ host Paul Mabelis.

    VRM Live – 11/04/10: Vaccine Resistance Movement founder Joel Lord lays out the whole vaccine process with Paul Mabelis; including heavy metal toxicity, synergy, pregnancy issues & the basic principles of natural health at risk.

    VRM Live – 09/24/10: Vaccine Resistance Movement Founder Joel Lord & activist/radio host Jesse Calhoun lay it all out tonite. Topics include the VRM Worldwide Autism Study, Scientific/Medical dictatorship, Natural Rights & Vaccine Industry fraud exposed. Special thanks to host Paul Mabelis.

    If you appreciate the efforts to bring this information forward do consider making a donation. Any amount, no matter how small will help enable me to carry on this invaluable research. See Paypal link on the VRM website (click on ‘Donate’ tab in upper right corner). Thank you all.



  • 9 Responses to “VRM: “One For All” Universal Flu Vaccine – 21st Century Genetic Roulette Part 1”